share_log

Valaris' (NYSE:VAL) Earnings Aren't As Good As They Appear

Valaris' (NYSE:VAL) Earnings Aren't As Good As They Appear

華仕伯(紐交所: VAL)的盈利看起來並不那麼好。
Simply Wall St ·  08/09 06:11

Investors were disappointed with Valaris Limited's (NYSE:VAL) recent earnings release. We did some analysis and believe that they might be concerned about some weak underlying factors.

華仕伯有限公司(NYSE:VAL)最近的盈利公告讓投資者失望。我們進行了一些分析,認爲他們可能對一些弱勢因素感到擔憂。

big
NYSE:VAL Earnings and Revenue History August 9th 2024
紐交所:VAL 收益和營業收入歷史 August 9th 2024

Examining Cashflow Against Valaris' Earnings

審查 Valaris 營收與盈利現金流

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

在高端金融領域,用於衡量公司將實際利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是應記比率(來自現金流)。要獲取應計比率,我們首先要從某一期間的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均營運資產。這個比率告訴我們公司實際利潤有多少不是由自由現金流支持的。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,負的應計利潤率對公司來說是積極的,而正的應計利潤率則是負面的。雖然有正的應計利潤率不是問題,表示某種程度的非現金利潤,但高的應計利潤率可能是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。引用Lewellen和Resutek 2014年的一篇論文:「具有更高應計利潤的公司未來 tend to be less profitable。」

For the year to June 2024, Valaris had an accrual ratio of 0.83. Statistically speaking, that's a real negative for future earnings. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of US$648m, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of US$1.02b. We saw that FCF was US$129m a year ago though, so Valaris has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. Importantly, we note an unusual tax situation, which we discuss below, has impacted the accruals ratio. This would certainly have contributed to the weak cash conversion. One positive for Valaris shareholders is that it's accrual ratio was significantly better last year, providing reason to believe that it may return to stronger cash conversion in the future. As a result, some shareholders may be looking for stronger cash conversion in the current year.

截至2024年6月的全年,Valaris 的應計比率爲0.83。從統計學的角度來看,這對未來的盈利是真正的負面影響。在那段時間內,公司沒有產生任何自由現金流。相比之下,過去一年,自由現金流實際上爲負6,480萬美元,而利潤則爲10.2億美元。然而,我們也看到在一年前,FCF爲1.29億美元,因此Valaris至少過去能夠產生正FCF。重要的是,我們注意到一個不尋常的稅收情況,我們在下文中討論,已經對應計比率產生了影響。這肯定會導致現金轉換的疲軟。對於Valaris的股東來說,一個積極的因素是,去年它的應計比率顯着改善,這就有理由相信它可能會在未來回到更強的現金轉換。因此,一些股東可能會尋求更強的現金轉換。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

An Unusual Tax Situation

一種不尋常的稅務情況

Moving on from the accrual ratio, we note that Valaris profited from a tax benefit which contributed US$797m to profit. It's always a bit noteworthy when a company is paid by the tax man, rather than paying the tax man. The receipt of a tax benefit is obviously a good thing, on its own. However, the devil in the detail is that these kind of benefits only impact in the year they are booked, and are often one-off in nature. In the likely event the tax benefit is not repeated, we'd expect to see its statutory profit levels drop, at least in the absence of strong growth. While we think it's good that the company has booked a tax benefit, it does mean that there's every chance the statutory profit will come in a lot higher than it would be if the income was adjusted for one-off factors.

從應計比率出發,我們注意到Valaris從稅收優惠中獲得了7970萬美元的利潤。當公司獲得稅務監管機關的付款而不是向它付款時,這總是引起人們的注意。顯然,收到稅收優惠是一件好事。然而,問題在於,這類優惠隻影響它們被認定的年份,並且往往是一次性的。很可能是這種稅收優惠不會再次出現,我們期望看到該公司的盈利水平下降,至少在沒有強勁增長的情況下如此。雖然我們認爲公司已經獲得稅收優惠是好事,但這意味着如果收入根據一次性因素進行調整,那麼統計利潤有可能高出很多。

Our Take On Valaris' Profit Performance

我們對Valaris的盈利表現的看法

This year, Valaris couldn't match its profit with cashflow. On top of that, the unsustainable nature of tax benefits mean that there's a chance profit may be lower next year, certainly in the absence of strong growth. On reflection, the above-mentioned factors give us the strong impression that Valaris'underlying earnings power is not as good as it might seem, based on the statutory profit numbers. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Valaris you should be aware of.

今年,Valaris的盈利無法與現金流匹配。此外,稅收優惠的不可持續性意味着,如果缺乏強勁增長,未來盈利可能會更低。回顧上述因素,我們強烈感覺到,基於統計利潤數字,Valaris的基本盈利能力並不像它表面上看起來那樣好。鑑於此,如果你想對公司進行更深入的分析,了解涉及的風險是必要的。例如:我們注意到Valaris存在一個警告標誌,您應該謹慎考慮。

Our examination of Valaris has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

我們對Valaris的調查聚焦於某些因素,這些因素可以使它的盈利看起來比實際更好。基於這一點,我們還是持懷疑態度的。但是,還有很多其他方式來了解一個公司。一些人認爲高股本回報是一個優質企業的好跡象。雖然這可能需要一些研究,但您可能會發現這些美股公司收益高,或者這些股票內部持股巨大的免費收集列表有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論