share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Avista Corporation's (NYSE:AVA) Recent US$106m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Avista Corporation's (NYSE:AVA) Recent US$106m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构投资者可能会忽略阿维斯塔公司(NYSE:AVA)最近1.06亿美元的市值下跌,因为长期利润保持稳定。
Simply Wall St ·  08/11 10:43

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Avista's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构持股极多意味着Avista的股价很容易受到它们的交易行为影响。
  • 前七大股东持有了该公司50%的股份。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

Every investor in Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 87% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

作为Avista Corporation(纽交所:AVA)的投资者,应该注意公司最强大的股东组合。持有公司股份最多的是机构,确切地说占据了公司87%的股份。换句话说,该机构面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$3.0b last week. However, the 10% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

市值下跌至30亿美元后,机构投资者是受到最大影响的群体。然而,10%的股东一年的回报率可能有所减轻他们的痛苦。然而,我们认为他们将会关注未来的弱点。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Avista.

我们来更深入地了解一下Avista的股东类型能够给我们带来什么样的启示。

big
NYSE:AVA Ownership Breakdown August 11th 2024
纽交所:AVA所有权盘点2024年8月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avista?

机构持股告诉我们有关Avista的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Avista does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Avista's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到Avista确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的大部分股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看过这些股票,并且他们喜欢这支股票。但是和其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变了他们对某支股票的看法,那么您可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的Avista的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:AVA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 11th 2024
纽交所:AVA盈利和营业收入增长2024年8月11日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Avista. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此他们可能会对董事会决策产生强烈的影响。我们注意到,对Avista的投资意义不大的是对冲基金。通过查看我们的数据,我们可以看到持股量最多的股东是持有19%的BlackRock,其次持有12%的是第二大股东,第三大股东持有6.4%的所有权。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现该公司超过一半的股权由前7大股东持有,这意味着较小股东的利益在一定程度上可以平衡较大股东的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Avista

Avista的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Avista Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$28m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最新的数据显示,内部持有Avista Corporation的股份不到1%。请记住,这是一家大公司,内部持有股票净值2800万美元。绝对价值可能比相对价值更重要。看到董事会成员持有股份当然是好事,但查看这些内部人是否一直在购买股票也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Avista. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

拥有12%的持股量的普通市民,主要包括个人投资者,对Avista有一定的影响。虽然这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Avista better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Avista (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

思考公司的不同股东群体持有什么股份是值得的。但要更好地了解Avista,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了3个警示信号对于Avista(其中一个有点令人担忧)的,您应该注意到。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发