Positive Week for Chimera Investment Corporation (NYSE:CIM) Institutional Investors Who Lost 5.3% Over the Past Year
Positive Week for Chimera Investment Corporation (NYSE:CIM) Institutional Investors Who Lost 5.3% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Chimera Investment implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 44% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 机构在Chimera Investment拥有实质性持股,这意味着它们对公司股价有重大影响。
- 前25名股东拥有公司44%的所有权。
- 内部人员最近一直在买入。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chimera Investment Corporation (NYSE:CIM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解Chimera Investment Corporation(NYSE:CIM)真正控制权的谁,了解业务的所有权结构是很重要的。在该公司持有最多股份的群体中,精确地说是约51%的机构。换句话说,该群体从其对公司的投资中获得最多(或失去最多)。
Last week's US$83m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 5.3% losses.
上周8300万美元的市值增长可能会受到机构投资者的欢迎,特别是在经历了5.3%的亏损之后。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chimera Investment.
让我们仔细观察各类型股东可以向我们展示有关Chimera Investment的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chimera Investment?
机构持股对Chimera Investment有什么影响?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
Chimera Investment already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Chimera Investment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Chimera Investment已经有机构出现在股东名册上。他们在公司拥有令人敬佩的股份。这可以表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所谓的认可。他们也会犯错误。当多个机构拥有某种股票时,总存在着他们进行“拥挤交易”的风险。这种交易出现问题时,多方可能争相快速出售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下面看到Chimera Investment的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事远远不止于此。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chimera Investment. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 8.5% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此他们可能共同强烈影响董事会决策。我们注意到对冲基金在Chimera Investment上没有实质性的投资。通过查看数据,我们可以看到最大股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,拥有9.6%的流通股份。BlackRock,Inc.和Charles Schwab Investment Management,Inc.分别拥有8.5%和7.2%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Chimera Investment
Chimera Investment内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Chimera Investment Corporation in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$11m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人员以自己的名义拥有的Chimera Investment Corporation的股权不到1%。请记住,这是一个大公司,内部人员拥有1100万美元的股份,绝对价值可能比比例份额更重要。可以说,最近的买卖同样重要。您可以 单击此处查看内幕人员是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Chimera Investment. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
持有48%所有权的普通公众,主要是个人投资者,对Chimera Investment有一定的影响力。尽管持股比例相当大,但如果决策不符合其他大股东的决定,这可能还不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Chimera Investment is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those are concerning...
我发现了解到底谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正获得深入的了解,我们需要考虑其他信息。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,Chimera Investment显示有4个警告信号,其中2个令人担忧...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。