Returns At Ingredion (NYSE:INGR) Appear To Be Weighed Down
Returns At Ingredion (NYSE:INGR) Appear To Be Weighed Down
Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Ingredion (NYSE:INGR) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.
您是否知道有一些財務指標可以提供潛在成長股的提示?首先,我們想看到一個經過驗證的資本僱用回報率(ROCE)在增長,其次是不斷擴大的資本僱用基礎。如果您看到這一點,則通常意味着這是一家擁有出色業務模式和衆多有利可圖的再投資機會的公司。然而,簡要查看數字後,我們認爲Ingredion(NYSE:INGR)未來不具備成爲潛在成長股的特點,但讓我們看看可能原因。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源現行ROCE與之前資本回報的比較,但過去只能知道這麼多。如果您感興趣,可以查看我們免費的蒙托克可再生能源分析師報告,了解分析師的預測。
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Ingredion, this is the formula:
如果您以前沒有使用ROCE,請注意它衡量公司從其業務中使用的資本僱用產生的「回報」(稅前利潤)。要爲Ingredion計算此指標,這是公式:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.15 = US$900m ÷ (US$7.2b - US$1.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.15 = US $ 9億 ÷(US $ 7.2十億- US $ 1.2億)(截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, Ingredion has an ROCE of 15%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 11% generated by the Food industry.
因此,Ingredion的ROCE爲15%。僅就此而言,這是一個標準回報,但是它比食品行業的11%要好得多。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Ingredion compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Ingredion .
如上所示,您可以看到Ingredion目前的ROCE與其以前的資本回報率相比如何,但過去的信息只能提供有限的信息。如果您想了解分析師的預測,請查看我們爲Ingredion提供的免費分析師報告。
So How Is Ingredion's ROCE Trending?
Ingredion的ROCE趨勢如何?
Over the past five years, Ingredion's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So don't be surprised if Ingredion doesn't end up being a multi-bagger in a few years time. This probably explains why Ingredion is paying out 35% of its income to shareholders in the form of dividends. Given the business isn't reinvesting in itself, it makes sense to distribute a portion of earnings among shareholders.
在過去的五年中,Ingredion的ROCE和資本僱用基礎大多保持不變。具有這些特徵的企業往往是成熟並保持穩定運營,因爲它們已經過了增長階段。因此,如果Ingredion未來幾年不會成爲潛在成長股,這就解釋了爲什麼它將以35%的股息形式向股東支付其收入的部分。考慮到業務不再進行再投資,將一部分收益分配給股東是有道理的。
What We Can Learn From Ingredion's ROCE
我們可以從Ingredion的ROCE中學到什麼
In a nutshell, Ingredion has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. Since the stock has gained an impressive 97% over the last five years, investors must think there's better things to come. Ultimately, if the underlying trends persist, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger going forward.
簡而言之,Ingredion在過去的五年中一直保持着相同的資本回報率並獲得了相同數量的資本回報。由於該股票過去五年增長了驚人的97%,因此投資者認爲將有更好的前景。最終,如果基礎趨勢持續不變,我們不認爲它將成爲潛在成長股。如果您想繼續研究Ingredion,您可能會對了解我們分析的1個警告標誌感興趣。
If you want to continue researching Ingredion, you might be interested to know about the 1 warning sign that our analysis has discovered.
如果您想繼續研究Ingredion,您可能會對了解我們分析的1個警告標誌感興趣。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想尋找財務狀況良好、回報卓越的實力強企業,可以免費查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。