share_log

Tong Ren Tang Technologies Co. Ltd.'s (HKG:1666) Fundamentals Look Pretty Strong: Could The Market Be Wrong About The Stock?

Tong Ren Tang Technologies Co. Ltd.'s (HKG:1666) Fundamentals Look Pretty Strong: Could The Market Be Wrong About The Stock?

同仁堂科技股份有限公司(HKG:1666)的基本面看起來非常強勁:股市可能對該股錯了?
Simply Wall St ·  08/13 00:42

It is hard to get excited after looking at Tong Ren Tang Technologies' (HKG:1666) recent performance, when its stock has declined 9.0% over the past three months. But if you pay close attention, you might find that its key financial indicators look quite decent, which could mean that the stock could potentially rise in the long-term given how markets usually reward more resilient long-term fundamentals. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Tong Ren Tang Technologies' ROE today.

同仁堂科技(HKG:1666)近三個月的股票下跌了9.0%,看到這個表現以後難以振奮。但是,如果您仔細觀察,可能會發現其關鍵的財務指標看起來相當不錯,這意味着股票在長期內可能會上漲,因爲市場通常會回報更具有韌性的長期基本面。特別是,我們將會關注同仁堂科技的roe今天。

ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.

roe或股東權益回報率是評估公司如何有效地從股東那裏獲得回報的有用工具。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其權益資本的盈利能力。

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股東權益報酬率?

ROE can be calculated by using the formula:

淨資產收益率可以使用以下公式進行計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Tong Ren Tang Technologies is:

因此,根據上述公式,同仁堂科技的roe爲:

10% = CN¥992m ÷ CN¥9.7b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).

10% = CN¥99200萬 ÷ CN¥97億(截至2023年12月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the yearly profit. That means that for every HK$1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated HK$0.10 in profit.

『回報』是每年的利潤。這意味着對於每港元的股東權益,該公司產生了0.10港元的利潤。

What Is The Relationship Between ROE And Earnings Growth?

ROE與盈利增長之間的關係是什麼?

So far, we've learned that ROE is a measure of a company's profitability. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes.

到目前爲止,我們已經知道roe是衡量公司盈利能力的一種方法。現在我們需要評估公司重新投資或「保留」的利潤有多少,以此來了解公司的增長潛力。一般來說,其他因素相同的情況下,roe和利潤保留都較高的公司比不具備這些屬性的公司具有更高的增長率。

Tong Ren Tang Technologies' Earnings Growth And 10% ROE

同仁堂科技的淨利潤增長和10%的roe

To begin with, Tong Ren Tang Technologies seems to have a respectable ROE. And on comparing with the industry, we found that the the average industry ROE is similar at 12%. Tong Ren Tang Technologies' decent returns aren't reflected in Tong Ren Tang Technologies'mediocre five year net income growth average of 2.5%. So, there could be some other factors at play that could be impacting the company's growth. For instance, the company pays out a huge portion of its earnings as dividends, or is faced with competitive pressures.

首先,同仁堂科技似乎擁有可觀的roe。與行業相比,我們發現平均行業roe在12%左右。同仁堂科技的回報雖然不錯,但並沒有反映在其平均五年淨收入增長率僅爲2.5%的平庸增長上。因此,可能存在其他因素影響着公司的增長。例如,公司將其大部分收益作爲分紅派息,或面臨競爭壓力。

We then compared Tong Ren Tang Technologies' net income growth with the industry and found that the company's growth figure is lower than the average industry growth rate of 5.9% in the same 5-year period, which is a bit concerning.

然後,我們將同仁堂科技的淨利潤增長與行業進行了比較,並發現該公司的增長速度低於同一5年期間平均行業增長率5.9%的水平,這有點令人擔憂。

big
SEHK:1666 Past Earnings Growth August 13th 2024
SEHK:1666過去的淨利潤增長(2024年8月13日)

Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. Is Tong Ren Tang Technologies fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.

淨利潤增長是股票估值的一個重要因素。投資者應該試圖確定預期的收益增長或下降(無論哪種情況)是否被定價。這樣做將有助於他們確定股票的未來前景是有希望還是不妙。同仁堂科技相對於其他公司有公正的估值嗎?這三個估值指標可能會幫助您做出決定。

Is Tong Ren Tang Technologies Making Efficient Use Of Its Profits?

同仁堂科技是否在有效地利用其利潤?

Despite having a normal three-year median payout ratio of 40% (or a retention ratio of 60% over the past three years, Tong Ren Tang Technologies has seen very little growth in earnings as we saw above. Therefore, there might be some other reasons to explain the lack in that respect. For example, the business could be in decline.

儘管在過去三年內分紅比率的中值爲40%(或過去三年留存比率爲60%),但同仁堂科技的收益增長很少,正如我們以上看到的那樣。因此,可能會有其他原因來解釋在這方面的不足。例如,業務可能在下降。

Moreover, Tong Ren Tang Technologies has been paying dividends for at least ten years or more suggesting that management must have perceived that the shareholders prefer dividends over earnings growth.

此外,同仁堂科技已經連續十年或更長時間支付分紅,表明管理層必須認爲股東更喜歡分紅而不是收益增長。

Conclusion

結論

Overall, we feel that Tong Ren Tang Technologies certainly does have some positive factors to consider. Yet, the low earnings growth is a bit concerning, especially given that the company has a high rate of return and is reinvesting ma huge portion of its profits. By the looks of it, there could be some other factors, not necessarily in control of the business, that's preventing growth. With that said, the latest industry analyst forecasts reveal that the company's earnings are expected to accelerate. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.

總的來說,我們認爲同仁堂科技肯定有一些積極因素需要考慮。然而,低收益增長令人有些擔憂,特別是考慮到公司具有較高的回報率並正在將其利潤重新投資。看起來,可能有一些其他因素,並非公司所控制,阻礙了其增長。話雖如此,最新的行業分析師預測表明,公司的盈利預計將加速。這些分析師的預測是基於行業的廣泛預期,還是基於公司的基本面?點擊此處進入我們的分析師預測頁面。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論