share_log

Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 65%

Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 65%

杜克能源公司(纽交所:DUK)是机构投资者的最爱,他们持有65%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  08/14 06:44

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Duke Energy's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构高度持股意味着杜克能源的股价对他们的交易行动非常敏感。
  • 共有25位投资者拥有该公司的大多数股份,占公司股份43%。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

A look at the shareholders of Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 65% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下Duke Energy Corporation (纽交所:DUK)的股东,我们就可以知道哪个群体最有权势。我们可以看到机构持有公司的大部分股份,拥有65%的股权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获得最大的利润(如果出现下跌,也将承受最大的损失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Duke Energy.

在下图中,我们放大查看了不同的杜克能源股权所有者群体。

big
NYSE:DUK Ownership Breakdown August 14th 2024
纽交所:DUK股权结构分布2024年8月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Duke Energy?

机构持股告诉我们杜克能源的哪些信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Duke Energy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Duke Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,杜克能源确实拥有机构投资者;而且他们持有公司的股份相当大。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究过该股票并喜欢它。但是与其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。当多个机构投资同一只股票时,总会存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方面可能会竞相卖出股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以查看Duke Energy历史上的收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事永远不只局限于此。

big
NYSE:DUK Earnings and Revenue Growth August 14th 2024
纽交所:DUK收入和收益增长2024年8月14日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Duke Energy. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.2%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以共同行使重要权利。对于杜克能源,对冲基金持股不多。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,股权占比9.2%。为了解背景,第二大股东持有约7.4%的流通股,第三大股东持有5.0%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Duke Energy

杜克能源的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Duke Energy Corporation. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$123m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员所持有的Duke Energy Corporation的股份少于1%。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人员持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们持有价值1,230万美元的股份。在这种情况下,更有意思的是看看这些内部人员是否一直在购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Duke Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有杜克能源的34%的股份。这样的所有权规模虽然很大,但如果该决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Duke Energy (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我发现看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。比如,投资风险的永恒威胁。我们已经确定了杜克能源的3个预警信号(至少其中的1个让我们有点不舒服),理解它们应该是你的投资过程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发