Following a 23% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:AVDX) Institutional Owners
Following a 23% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:AVDX) Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies AvidXchange Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 显著的高机构持股意味着AvidXchange Holdings的股价对其交易行为很敏感。
- 该公司有15名投资者持有多数股份,拥有51%的所有权。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:AVDX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要想真正了解AvidXchange Holdings, Inc. (纳斯达克股票代码:AVDX)掌控权的归属,了解业务的所有权结构是至关重要的。在该公司持有最多股份的团体中,大约有80%是机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个群体将获得最多的好处(如果出现衰退,则为最大损失)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 3.7% increase in the share price after a year of 23% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
机构投资者可能会欢迎上周股价上涨3.7%,因为1年23%的亏损让他们意识到收益可能开始上升。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AvidXchange Holdings.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们什么有关AvidXchange Holdings。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AvidXchange Holdings?
机构持股告诉我们关于AvidXchange Holdings的什么事实?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AvidXchange Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AvidXchange Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在AvidXchange Holdings方面持有相当大的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看过这支股票了,而且他们喜欢它。但和任何其他人一样,他们也可能错。如果多个机构同时改变他们对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看看AvidXchange Holdings以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in AvidXchange Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Michael Praeger, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可以强烈地影响董事会的决策。对AvidXchange Holdings来说,对冲基金持有的股票不多。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有8.3%的股份。同时,第2和第3大股东分别持有6.8%和5.5%的流通股。Michael Praeger是第二大股东,也是首席执行官。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股东注册表后,我们可以看到15名股东控制了51%的所有权,这意味着没有单一股东拥有所有权中的大多数份额。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of AvidXchange Holdings
AvidXchange Holdings的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in AvidXchange Holdings, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$143m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告内部人持有AvidXchange Holdings,Inc.的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,所以看到一些潜在的有意义的一致性是一件好事。在这种情况下,他们持有价值约14300万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果你想探索内部人一致性的问题,你可以点击这里查看内部人是否一直在买入或卖出股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众——包括零售投资者——在公司中拥有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。虽然持股规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - AvidXchange Holdings has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我认为了解一家公司的真正所有权是非常有趣的。但为了真正获得见解,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,冒险——AvidXchange Holdings有2个警告标志,我们认为你应该了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。