share_log

United Maritime's (NASDAQ:USEA) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear

United Maritime's (NASDAQ:USEA) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear

United Maritime(纳斯达克:USEA)的不佳财报可能比看起来还要糟糕
Simply Wall St ·  08/16 08:29

United Maritime Corporation (NASDAQ:USEA) recently posted soft earnings but shareholders didn't react strongly. We did some analysis and found some concerning details beneath the statutory profit number.

最近联合海运公司(纳斯达克:USEA)发布了软实力收益,但股东没有强烈反应。我们进行了一些分析,找到了法定利润数字下面的一些令人担忧的细节。

big
NasdaqCM:USEA Earnings and Revenue History August 16th 2024
纳斯达克CM:USEA收益和营业收入历史记录2024年8月16日

Zooming In On United Maritime's Earnings

聚焦联合海运的收益

Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

许多投资者没有听说过现金流的权责发生制比率,但实际上它是一个衡量公司在一定时期内利润受自由现金流(FCF)支持程度的有用指标。该权责发生制比率将给定期间的自由现金流从利润中减去,并将结果除以公司在此期间的平均营运资产。该比率告诉我们公司利润中有多少是不受自由现金流支持的。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,当一个公司应记比率为负数时,实际上这被视为一件好事,而如果该比率为正数则被视为一件坏事。这并不意味着我们应该担心正的应记比率,但值得注意的是,当应计比率相当高时,引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年的一篇论文"高应计的公司未来的盈利能力较差"。

For the year to June 2024, United Maritime had an accrual ratio of 0.21. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, which is hardly a good thing. Even though it reported a profit of US$7.45m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through US$17m in the last year. We also note that United Maritime's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of US$17m. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

为2024年6月的一年,联合海运的应计比率为0.21。因此,我们知道它的自由现金流显著低于其法定利润,这绝非一件好事。尽管它报告了745万美元的利润,但自由现金流的观察表明,它实际上在过去一年中烧掉了1700万美元。我们还注意到,联合海运的自由现金流在去年实际上也是负的,所以我们可以理解股东对其1700万美元的流出感到烦恼。话虽如此,故事还有更多内容。我们可以看到,异常项目影响了其法定利润,因此影响了应计比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

非常规项目如何影响利润?

As it happens, there are a few different things to consider when we look at United Maritime's profit and the last one we'll mention is US$12m gain booked as unusual items. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. United Maritime had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to June 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

恰好,当我们查看联合海运的利润以及最后一个利润时,有几个不同的事情需要考虑,其中一个是作为异常项目预定的1200万美元的增益。虽然我们喜欢看到利润的增加,但当异常项目对其产生重大贡献时,我们倾向于更加谨慎。我们在全球大部分上市公司上跑了数字,发现异常项目很普遍是一次性的。鉴于名称,这并不奇怪。相对于其2024年6月的利润,United Maritime的异常项目贡献非常重要。因此,我们可以推断,异常项目正在使其法定利润显著强于它本来应该的水平。

Our Take On United Maritime's Profit Performance

我们对联合海运的利润表现的看法

Summing up, United Maritime received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. Considering all this we'd argue United Maritime's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. To help with this, we've discovered 5 warning signs (2 make us uncomfortable!) that you ought to be aware of before buying any shares in United Maritime.

总起来说,联合海运从异常项目中获得了良好的利润提升,但无法将其纸面利润与自由现金流相匹配。考虑到这一点,我们认为联合海运的利润可能给人一种过于慷慨的盈利能力持续水平的印象。鉴于这一点,如果您想对该公司进行更多的分析,了解涉及的风险是至关重要的。为此,我们已发现5个警告信号(其中2个让我们感到不舒服!)在购买联合海运的任何股票之前必须知道。

Our examination of United Maritime has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

我们对联合海运的审查集中在某些因素上,这些因素可以使其收益看起来比实际情况要好。在这个基础上,我们有些怀疑。但是,如果您能集中精力在细节上,总会有更多的发现。有些人认为高股本回报率是优质企业的良好迹象。因此,您可能希望查看这些具有高股本回报率的公司的免费合集,或具有高内部所有权的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发