share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Gartner (NYSE:IT) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Gartner (NYSE:IT) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

这4项措施表明Gartner(纽交所:IT)合理运用债务。
Simply Wall St ·  08/17 08:07

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Gartner, Inc. (NYSE:IT) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

David Iben说得很好:“波动性不是我们关心的风险。我们关心的是避免资本永久损失。”当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢看它的利用债务情况,因为债务过载可能会导致破产。我们注意到加特纳股份有限公司(纽交所:IT)确实在其资产负债表上有债务。但更重要的问题是: 这些债务制造了多大的风险?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时有危险?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般来说,只有当公司无法轻松地偿还债务时,债务才会成为真正的问题,无论是通过筹集资本还是使用自己的现金流。资本主义的一部分是“创造性破坏”过程,即银行家无情地清算失败的企业。然而,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东以控制债务。当然,在业务中,债务可以是一个重要的工具,特别是对于资本密集型企业。在考虑企业使用多少债务时,首先要看其现金和债务的总和。

What Is Gartner's Debt?

加特纳的债务是什么?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Gartner had US$2.46b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$1.24b in cash leading to net debt of about US$1.22b.

下面的图表(您可以单击以获得更详细的信息)显示,加特纳在2024年6月有24.6亿美元的债务,与前一年相同。反过来,它拥有12.4亿美元的现金,导致净债务约为12.2亿美元。

big
NYSE:IT Debt to Equity History August 17th 2024
纽交所:IT的债务股本比历史记录于2024年8月17日

A Look At Gartner's Liabilities

审视加特纳的负债

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Gartner had liabilities of US$3.46b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$3.32b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$1.24b as well as receivables valued at US$1.43b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.11b.

放大最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到加特纳有346亿美元的负债在12个月内到期,332亿美元的负债超过12个月到期。抵消这些义务,它拥有12.4亿美元的现金以及14.3亿美元的应收账款在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债超过了其现金和(短期)应收账款的总额411亿美元。

Since publicly traded Gartner shares are worth a very impressive total of US$37.3b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

由于公开交易的加特纳股票总价值为373亿美元,因此似乎这种程度的负债不会构成重大威胁。然而,我们认为值得关注其资产负债表的强度,因为它可能随着时间而改变。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

Gartner's net debt is only 0.94 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 14.8 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On the other hand, Gartner saw its EBIT drop by 3.2% in the last twelve months. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Gartner can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

加特纳的净债务仅为其EBITDA的0.94倍。它的EBIT覆盖了其利息支出的整整14.8倍。因此,您可以认为它受到债务威胁的程度不比大象受老鼠威胁大。另一方面,加特纳在过去十二个月中的EBIT下降了3.2%。如果这种下降持续下去,很明显将使债务更难控制。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但最终业务的未来盈利能力将决定加特纳能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现这份有关分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Gartner generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 92% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最后,公司只能用冷酷无情的现金而不是会计利润偿还债务。因此,逻辑上的下一步是查看与实际自由现金流相匹配的EBIT的比例。在过去的三年中,加特纳产生了非常强大的92%的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的比例,这超出了我们的预期。这使其可以在必要时偿还债务。

Our View

我们的观点

Happily, Gartner's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. Zooming out, Gartner seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Gartner that you should be aware of.

令人欣慰的是,加特纳令人印象深刻的利息覆盖率意味着它在处理债务方面更占优势。但是,更令人忧虑的是它的EBIT增长率。放大来看,加特纳似乎相当合理地使用债务。虽然债务确实带来风险,但在明智使用时也可以带来更高的股权回报。显然,资产负债表是您分析债务的主要关注领域。但最终,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。例如,我们已经确定了对加特纳的2个警告信号,这是您应该了解的。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

当然,如果您是那种喜欢购买没有债务负担的股票的投资者,那么不要犹豫,立即发现我们独家的净现金增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发