Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) Shareholders Have Earned a 33% CAGR Over the Last Five Years
Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) Shareholders Have Earned a 33% CAGR Over the Last Five Years
For many, the main point of investing in the stock market is to achieve spectacular returns. While the best companies are hard to find, but they can generate massive returns over long periods. To wit, the Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROAD) share price has soared 310% over five years. And this is just one example of the epic gains achieved by some long term investors. We note the stock price is up 1.9% in the last seven days.
對於很多人來說,投資股票市場的主要目的是獲得驚人的回報。儘管最好的公司很難找到,但它們可以在長時間內產生巨大的回報。例如,Construction Partners, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ROAD)的股價在過去五年中飆升了310%。這僅是一些長期投資者所實現的巨大收益的一個例子。我們注意到該股票價格在過去七天中上漲了1.9%。
So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.
那麼,讓我們調查一下並查看公司的長期表現是否符合基本業務的進展。
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
禾倫·巴菲特在他的文章《格雷厄姆與多德維爾的超級投資者》中描述了股票價格並不總是合理地反映了一家企業的價值。考慮市場對一家公司的看法如何轉變的一種不完美但簡單的方法,是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價的動態進行比較。
Over half a decade, Construction Partners managed to grow its earnings per share at 11% a year. This EPS growth is slower than the share price growth of 33% per year, over the same period. So it's fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it did five years ago. And that's hardly shocking given the track record of growth. This favorable sentiment is reflected in its (fairly optimistic) P/E ratio of 46.07.
在過去的五年中,Construction Partners成功地將每股收益增長了11%。相比之下,同期股價增長33%,因此可以認爲市場對該公司的業務有更高的意見。考慮到增長的記錄,這並不令人驚訝。這種良好氛圍反映在其(相當樂觀的)P / E比率46.07中。
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖顯示了EPS隨時間變化的情況(點擊圖像以顯示確切值)。
It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. This free interactive report on Construction Partners' earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further.
值得注意的是,該公司的CEO的薪酬低於同等規模公司的中位數。但是,雖然CEO的報酬始終值得檢查,但真正重要的問題是該公司能否在未來增加收益。如果您想進一步調查該股票,Construction Partners的收益,營業收入和現金流的免費互動報告是一個很好的開始。
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
It's good to see that Construction Partners has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 82% in the last twelve months. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 33%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Construction Partners you should know about.
很高興看到Construction Partners在過去十二個月中以總股東回報率82%獎勵股東。這一收益高於五年期間的年平均股東回報率33%,因此似乎近期該公司的情緒很積極。在最好的情況下,這可能暗示着一些真正的業務動力,這意味着現在深入研究可能是一個絕佳的時機。作爲業務績效的代理人,我認爲長期的股價變動非常有趣。但是,爲了獲得真正的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如考慮風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現Construction Partners有2個值得了解的警告信號。
If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: many of them are unnoticed AND have attractive valuation).
如果您喜歡與管理層一起購買股票,那麼您可能會喜歡這個公司的免費列表。 (提示:其中許多公司不爲人注意且具有吸引力的估值。)
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。