share_log

Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688567) Last Week's 6.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688567) Last Week's 6.2% Decline Must Have Disappointed Private Companies Who Have a Significant Stake

上週遠興能源(贛州)股份有限公司(SHSE:688567)下跌了6.2%,這一定讓那些持有大量股份的私人公司感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  08/20 22:29

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Institutions own 16% of Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou)
  • 私營公司對Farasis Energy(Gan Zhou)的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 51% 的業務由前 7 名股東持有
  • 機構擁有 Farasis Energy(Gan Zhou)16% 的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688567), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了孚能源(贛州)有限公司(上海證券交易所代碼:688567),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲36%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 6.2% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌6.2%之後,私營公司遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou), beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Farasis Energy(Gan Zhou)的每種所有者。

big
SHSE:688567 Ownership Breakdown August 21st 2024
SHSE: 688567 所有權明細 2024 年 8 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou)?

關於孚能源(Gan Zhou),機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou). This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有遠見能源(Gan Zhou)的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Farasis Energy(Gan Zhou)的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

big
SHSE:688567 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 21st 2024
SHSE: 688567 收益和收入增長 2024 年 8 月 21 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou). Our data shows that Farasis Energy, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 4.0% of the stock.

對沖基金在孚能源(Gan Zhou)的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Farasis Energy, Inc.是最大的股東,已發行股份的20%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約13%和4.0%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,大股東中有7人約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou)

Farasis Energy(Gan Zhou)的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) Co., Ltd. insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥38m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,孚能源(贛州)有限公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值3800萬元人民幣的股票。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司32%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 13% stake in Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou). This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有孚能源(甘州)13%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 36%, of the Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看來私營公司擁有孚能源(贛州)36%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Farasis Energy (Gan Zhou) better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Farasis Energy(Gan Zhou),我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論