Sansure Biotech Inc.'s (SHSE:688289) Largest Shareholder, CEO Lizhong Dai Sees Holdings Value Fall by 3.4% Following Recent Drop
Sansure Biotech Inc.'s (SHSE:688289) Largest Shareholder, CEO Lizhong Dai Sees Holdings Value Fall by 3.4% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Sansure Biotech implies vested interests in company growth
- 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Institutions own 13% of Sansure Biotech
- Sansure生物科技公司有重要的內部人控制,意味着對公司增長有利益關係
- 前四大股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 機構擁有Sansure生物科技公司13%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sansure Biotech Inc. (SHSE:688289), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 44% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
爲了了解誰真正控制着Sansure生物科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688289),了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。個人內部人擁有公司44%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者下跌),該群體將獲益最多(或者損失最多)。
And following last week's 3.4% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上週股價下跌了3.4%之後,內部人員遭受了最大的虧損。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sansure Biotech, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Sansure Biotech的每一類所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sansure Biotech?
機構投資者的所有制告訴我們Sansure Biotech有些可信度。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Sansure Biotech. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sansure Biotech's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Sansure Biotech中佔有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有同一支股票時,總是存在他們可能處於一個'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到Sansure Biotech的歷史收入和營業收入,但要記住,故事總有更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sansure Biotech. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Lizhong Dai with 33% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.5% and 5.8% of the stock.
我們注意到對於Sansure Biotech而言,對沖基金並沒有多少實質性的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是首席執行官Lizhong Dai,持有公司33%的股票。 相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約6.5%和5.8%的股份。
On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察發現,前4大股東持有50%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司決策中具有重要的發言權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Sansure Biotech
Sansure Biotech的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Sansure Biotech Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥11b, and insiders have CN¥4.7b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
顯然,Sansure Biotech Inc.的內部人士擁有相當大比例的股份。其市值僅爲110億人民幣,而內部人士以約47億人民幣的股票名義擁有股份。這是相當可觀的。看到這種投資水平是好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有購買行爲。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sansure Biotech. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
佔有33%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Sansure Biotech有一定的影響力。雖然此持股比例可能不足以影響其政策決策,但他們仍然能夠對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 9.2%, of the Sansure Biotech stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
三生傳媒股份有限公司股份的9.2%似乎歸私營公司所有。私營公司可能是相關方。有時候內部人員通過持有私營公司的股權參與公共公司,而不是以個人的身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得作爲進一步研究的一個領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sansure Biotech better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Sansure Biotech is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is concerning...
了解三生傳媒股份有限公司更好的一種方式是考慮擁有該公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解三生傳媒股份有限公司,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。需要注意的是,我們的投資分析顯示三生傳媒股份有限公司存在2個警示信號,其中一個令人擔憂...
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。