The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 89%
The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 89%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cigna Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 道富銀行的股價對機構的交易行爲非常敏感,意味着機構的持股比例非常高。
- 16個投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,佔有51%的所有權。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
Every investor in The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位投資者都應該知道紐交所信諾集團(NYSE:CI)最重要的股東群體。機構持有公司89%的股份,佔據了最大的份額。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最多(或者如果市場下跌,損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cigna Group.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大顯示了信諾集團的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cigna Group?
機構所有權告訴我們關於信諾集團的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Cigna Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cigna Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
信諾集團已經在股份註冊表上有機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查信諾集團的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cigna Group. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.4%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.6% of the company stock.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對沖基金在信諾集團中沒有實質性投資。公司最大股東是先鋒集團,持有9.4%的股份。黑石集團是第二大股東,擁有8.5%的普通股,全球道富銀行註冊資本管理有限公司持有公司股份的約4.6%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前16名股東在該公司的擁有權佔比爲51%,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Cigna Group
信諾集團內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Cigna Group in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$331m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,信諾集團股東以自己的名義持有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部股東擁有公司的大部分股份可能會讓人感到驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同持有價值3,3100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部股東持有股份總是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cigna Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有10%的股權,主要由個人投資者構成的普通大衆對信諾集團有一定程度的影響力。雖然這一持股比例可能不足以左右政策決策朝着他們的方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Cigna Group you should be aware of.
我發現知道一家公司的真正所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子:我們發現《信諾》存在3個警示信號,你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。