The Recent HK$435m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798)
The Recent HK$435m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798)
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant insider control over Homeland Interactive Technology implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Homeland Interactive Technology存在重要的内部控制,意味着对公司增长有着特殊利益
- 前4大股东拥有该公司的52%。
- 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。
Every investor in Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd. (HKG:3798) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 65% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投资者都应该了解Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd.(HKG:3798)最强大的股东群体。拥有公司最多股份的群体,具体说是约65%的个人内部人员。换句话说,该群体将最有可能从他们对公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最多)
And following last week's 27% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.
在上周股价下跌27%之后,内部人员遭受了最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Homeland Interactive Technology.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关Homeland Interactive Technology的什么。
![1724366503156](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240823/42758939-0-0d0d5308cc3f2232b3be8ed846bb0a2a.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Homeland Interactive Technology?
机构所有权的缺乏对Homeland Interactive Technology有何提示?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Homeland Interactive Technology, for yourself, below.
有各种可能的原因解释为什么没有机构持有公司的股份。通常,小型新上市公司不会引起基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在公司建立有意义的持仓。也有可能是因为基金经理不持有该股票,他们并不认为它会表现良好。机构投资者可能并不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能还有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己查看Homeland Interactive Technology的过去营业收入表现。
![1724366504512](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240823/42758939-1-bc9f6412ab99e27f42aaada020e5c5fe.webp/bigjpg)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Homeland Interactive Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Chengze Wu with 34% of shares outstanding. With 6.6% and 6.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Mingkuan Jiang and Chunlong Ding are the second and third largest shareholders. Chunlong Ding, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
对于Homeland Interactive Technology来说,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是Chengze Wu,持有34%的流通股份。Mingkuan Jiang和Chunlong Ding分别持有6.6%和6.2%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股东。Chunlong Ding,作为第三大股东,也是董事会成员。
On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察发现,前四名股东持有52%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对该公司的决策有重要的发言权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京证券复合材料公司内部所有权情况
Insider Ownership Of Homeland Interactive Technology
Homeland Interactive Technology的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own HK$753m worth of shares in the HK$1.2b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人士拥有Homeland Interactive Technology Ltd.的大部分股权。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做决策。这意味着他们在这个市值12亿港元的公司中拥有75300万港元的股份,这是相当有意义的。很高兴看到有这样程度的投资。您可以在这里查看内部人士最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众,包括散户投资者,在该公司持有30%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽略。虽然拥有这种所有权的规模可能不足以使决策在他们的利益中而翻转,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 5.5%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
作为持有5.5%股权的股权投资公司,它们有能力在塑造企业战略方面发挥作用,并专注于价值创造。对此,某些投资者可能会感到鼓舞,因为股权投资有时能够鼓励采用有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。另外,这些持有者在将其上市后可能会退出投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Homeland Interactive Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Homeland Interactive Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
始终值得考虑公司股票的不同持有人群体。但要更好地了解华蓝互动科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,在我们的投资分析中,华蓝互动科技正在显示1个警告信号,您应该了解一下......
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最好的购买股票。因此,查看这份免费免费的有趣公司列表可能会有所帮助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。