Hubei Century Network Technology Inc.'s (SZSE:300494) Last Week's 7.7% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Hubei Century Network Technology Inc.'s (SZSE:300494) Last Week's 7.7% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Hubei Century Network Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
- 28% of Hubei Century Network Technology is held by insiders
- 湖北世紀網絡科技公司的股東中有很多零售投資者,這意味着他們在管理和業務策略方面共同擁有更大的發言權。
- 共有25家投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,達到49%的持股比例。
- 湖北世紀網絡科技公司的28%股份是內部持有的。
Every investor in Hubei Century Network Technology Inc. (SZSE:300494) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 48% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位湖北世紀網絡科技公司(SZSE:300494)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大股份的是零售投資者,佔股48%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(或者在發展低迷時損失最多)。
While insiders who own 28% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥4.5b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
上週市值下跌至45億元人民幣後,持有28%股份的內部人士面臨壓力,而零售投資者遭受了最大的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Hubei Century Network Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注湖北世紀科網股的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hubei Century Network Technology?
機構持股比例告訴我們什麼關於湖北世紀科網股?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Hubei Century Network Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hubei Century Network Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
湖北世紀科網股已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。實際上,他們在公司中擁有一定比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有同一只股票時,總是存在它們在一種「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到湖北世紀科網股的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事往往不止於此。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hubei Century Network Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chunlin Lai with 24% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.1% by the third-largest shareholder.
對湖北世紀網科進行了調研,發現對沖基金在該公司沒有太多股份的持有。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是董事長賴春霖,持有該公司24%的股份。與此同時,第二大股東持有約5.0%的股份,第三大股東持有2.1%的股份。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Hubei Century Network Technology
湖北世紀網科內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Hubei Century Network Technology Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.5b, and insiders have CN¥1.3b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
湖北科網股股份有限公司的內部人似乎擁有大量股份。其市值僅爲45億人民幣,內部人擁有13億人民幣的股份。能看到內部人員對業務如此投資是很好的。值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in Hubei Century Network Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆,持有湖北科網股48%的股份。雖然這一持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hubei Century Network Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hubei Century Network Technology you should be aware of.
始終值得考慮到不同的股東群體。但要更好地了解湖北世紀科網股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們發現了湖北世紀科網股的1個警示信號,你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。