Individual Investors Who Hold 47% of Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd. (SZSE:300502) Gained 6.2%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 47% of Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd. (SZSE:300502) Gained 6.2%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要见解
- Eoptolink Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 44% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders own 27% of Eoptolink Technology
- Eoptolink科技的重要个人投资者持股表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响
- 前25个股东持有44%的业务。
- 内部人士拥有Eoptolink科技27%的股权
Every investor in Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd. (SZSE:300502) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位投资Eoptolink科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300502)的投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司47%的股权,换句话说,该群体在公司投资中获得最多(或者失去最多)的利益。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥71b last week, while insiders who own 27% also benefitted.
上周市值触及710亿元后,个人投资者获得最多收益,持有27%的内部股东也受益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Eoptolink Technology.
在下面的图表中,我们细看Eoptolink Technology的不同所有权群体。
![1724395141364](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240823/42777728-0-dc11c100a10fea9c7bca5f8ac1feb932.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Eoptolink Technology?
机构投资所占的股权信息对Eoptolink Technology有何启示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Eoptolink Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Eoptolink Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Eoptolink Technology的股份登记薄上已经有机构的身影。他们确实持有该公司的相当一部分股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好要警惕对机构投资者所谓的验证依赖。他们有时也会出错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时卖出一只股票,很常见会出现大幅股价下跌的情况。因此,值得检查Eoptolink Technology的过往收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。
![1724386893240](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240823/42777728-1-85cf17be2552397b4d93ca2f85ef29ab.webp/bigjpg)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Eoptolink Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Guang Rong Gao, with ownership of 7.4%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.6% by the third-largest shareholder. Xiao Lei Huang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我们注意到对于Eoptolink Technology,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。该公司最大的股东是Guang Rong Gao,持有7.4%的股份。作为一个对比,第二大股东持有约7.1%的流通股份,第三大股东持有3.6%的股份。同时,第二大股东Xiao Lei Huang也是该公司的首席执行官。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Eoptolink Technology
Eoptolink Technology的内部股权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥71b, and insiders have CN¥19b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根据我们的信息,内部人员在亿光科技有限公司持有大部分股份。它的市值只有710亿元人民币,内部人员自己的股份价值有190亿元人民币。这相当可观。大多数人会认为这表明在这样一个规模的公司中,内部人员与股东有良好的一致性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in Eoptolink Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大众,通常是个体投资者,在亿光科技中持有47%的股份。虽然这个群体不能直接决策,但它确实对公司的经营产生了实质性的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Eoptolink Technology you should be aware of.
虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。 一个案例:我们发现Eoptolink Technology存在1个警示标志,您应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。