share_log

Institutions Along With Retail Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InWonders Information Co., Ltd (SZSE:300168) Come Under Pressure; Lose 7.3% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Retail Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InWonders Information Co., Ltd (SZSE:300168) Come Under Pressure; Lose 7.3% of Holdings Value

机构和持有康盛信息公司(SZSE:300168)相当数量股份的散户投资者承受压力,持有股份价值损失7.3%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/23 20:32

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Wonders Information indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Wonders Information is 23%
  • 百思信息的零售投资者持有大量股份,这表明他们在管理和业务策略上共同拥有更大的发言权。
  • 共有25家投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,达到49%的持股比例。
  • 百思信息的机构所有权占23%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Wonders Information Co., Ltd (SZSE:300168), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 51% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解百思信息股份有限公司(SZSE:300168)真正控制权的归属,理解业务所有权结构是很重要的。零售投资者持有51%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的群体。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 7.3% price drop, institutions with their 23% holdings also suffered.

上周股价下跌7.3%后,个人投资者的持股遭受重创,持股比例达23%的机构亦同样受到了影响。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Wonders Information.

让我们更仔细地了解一下,不同类型的股东对于万达信息有什么样的含义。

1724459518876
SZSE:300168 Ownership Breakdown August 24th 2024
深圳证券交易所:300168所有权拆分2024年8月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wonders Information?

机构所有权告诉我们什么关于万达信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Wonders Information. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Wonders Information's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所见,机构投资者在万达信息中有一定的股权。这可能意味着公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好要警惕过度依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证。他们也会有时候出错。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总有一个“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司,这个风险更高。您可以在下面看到万达信息的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,事情总是有更多的故事。

1724459520345
SZSE:300168 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 24th 2024
深圳证券交易所:300168年8月24日收益和收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Wonders Information. Our data shows that China Life Insurance (Group) Company is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. With 8.1% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hexie Health Insurance Co Ltd, Asset Management Arm and Ningbo Tongshang Group Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我们注意到对于Wonders Information,对冲基金并没有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,中国人寿保险(集团)公司是最大的股东,持有16%的股份。其次,Hexie Health Insurance Co Ltd和宁波通商集团有限公司分别持有8.1%和5.0%的股份,排名第二和第三。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。

Insider Ownership Of Wonders Information

Wonders Information的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Wonders Information Co., Ltd. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥95m worth of the CN¥7.1b company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据显示,内部人员在万达信息股份有限公司拥有一部分股份。作为个人,内部人员共同拥有价值9500万元的71亿元公司股份。这至少说明存在一定的共识。您可以单击此处查看这些内部人员是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Wonders Information shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

广大公众,主要包括个体投资者,共同持有万达信息股份的51%。这种所有权水平使来自更广泛的公众的投资者在关键的政策决策方面拥有一定的影响力,如董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 21%, of the Wonders Information stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

万达信息股票有21%的持股权属于私人公司。或许值得对此进行深入了解。如果关联方如内部人员对其中一家私人公司有兴趣,那应在年度报告中披露。私人公司可能对该公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Wonders Information has 2 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,要考虑风险 - 万达信息存在2个警示标志(1个不容忽视),我们认为您应该了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发