share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) With 56% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) With 56% Ownership

機構投資者在PubMatic, Inc. (納斯達克:PUBM)中持有56%的股權。
Simply Wall St ·  08/25 10:01

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, PubMatic's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考慮到機構在股票中所持有的大量股份,PubMatic的股價可能容易受到它們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前12名股東持有該業務的50%。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察PubMatic, Inc. (納斯達克:PUBM)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔公司股份的56%,是機構。換句話說,該群體在投資公司時將獲得最大的利潤(或最大的虧損)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$791m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 24%.

上週,機構投資者成爲最大的受益者,該公司市值達到7.91億美元。上週的收益還將進一步提高股東的一年回報率,目前爲24%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PubMatic.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對PubMatic有什麼影響。

1724594489387
NasdaqGM:PUBM Ownership Breakdown August 25th 2024
2024年8月25日納斯達克GM:pubmatic所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PubMatic?

機構投資者的持股情況對PubMatic有何影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PubMatic. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see PubMatic's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在PubMatic擁有相當大的股份。這可能意味着公司在投資社區享有一定的信譽。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總存在着它們可能形成的「衆多交易」。當此類交易出現問題時,多方可能競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下方查看PubMatic的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事往往不止於此。

1724586538787
NasdaqGM:PUBM Earnings and Revenue Growth August 25th 2024
pubmatic營收和收入增長2024年8月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in PubMatic. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.7%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Amar Goel, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive. Furthermore, CEO Rajeev Goel is the owner of 4.8% of the company's shares.

機構投資者持有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠強烈影響董事會決策。對PubMatic來說,對沖基金沒有很多股份。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,擁有8.7%的股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.6%和6.9%的流通股份。Amar Goel是第二大股東,同時還擔任首席關鍵高管。此外,首席執行官Rajeev Goel持有公司4.8%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過一些調查,我們發現前12名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of PubMatic

PubMatic的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of PubMatic, Inc.. Insiders own US$131m worth of shares in the US$791m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有PubMatic, Inc.相當比例的股份。內部人士在這家總市值7.91億美元的公司中持有1.31億美元的股份。看到內部人員如此投入業務真是太棒了。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in PubMatic. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通市民,通常是個人投資者,在PubMatic持有23%的股份。雖然這個群體不能直接左右公司的決策,但肯定可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 4.7% of PubMatic. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我們看到,上市公司擁有PubMatic的4.7%股份。這可能是戰略性利益,並且這兩家公司可能具有相關業務利益。可能是它們已經拆分。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PubMatic better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with PubMatic (including 1 which shouldn't be ignored) .

始終值得考慮不同股東群體。但要更好地了解PubMatic,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該了解我們在PubMatic發現的2個警告信號(包括1個不容忽視的信號) 。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論