Private Companies Who Own 39% Along With Institutions Invested in Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603237) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Private Companies Who Own 39% Along With Institutions Invested in Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603237) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 56% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry is 31%
- 私人公司對浙江五芳齋實業的重大控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理決策
- 該公司共有2位投資者持有其多數股權,佔有56%的所有權。
- 浙江五芳齋實業的機構持股比例爲31%
Every investor in Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603237) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 39% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
在浙江五芳齋實業股份有限公司(SHSE:603237)的每一位投資者都應該了解實力最強大的股東集團。我們可以看到,私人公司擁有該公司39%的所有權,換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Private companies gained the most after market cap touched CN¥3.0b last week, while institutions who own 31% also benefitted.
上週市值達到30億人民幣後,私人公司獲益最多,持股比例達到31%的機構也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究浙江五芳齋行業的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry?
機構所有權給我們關於浙江五芳齋行業的哪些信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到浙江五芳齋行業確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。有時他們也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看浙江五芳齋行業的盈利歷史可能還是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry. Our data shows that Wufangzhai Group Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對浙江五芳齋工業而言,對沖基金並不持有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,五芳齋集團有限公司是持有38%流通股的最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的18%和5.6%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry
浙江五芳齋工業內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥34m worth of the CN¥3.0b company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
股東可能會對了解到,浙江五芳齋實業股份有限公司的內部持股情況感興趣。作爲個人,內部持有人共同持有價值3,400萬人民幣的30億人民幣的公司。看到內部人員有一些投資是件好事,但也值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司28%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策方面左右陣腳取勝,但他們仍然可以對公司策略產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 39%, of the Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
浙江五芳齋實業股份有限公司的39%股份由私人公司持有。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得調查一下誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過另外的私人公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industry you should be aware of.
雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同團體,但還有更重要的因素。舉個例子:我們發現了浙江五芳齋實業一項警示信號,你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。