The Past Three Years for Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) Investors Has Not Been Profitable
The Past Three Years for Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) Investors Has Not Been Profitable
For many investors, the main point of stock picking is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Pinterest, Inc. (NYSE:PINS) shareholders, since the share price is down 43% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 18%. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 25% in the last 90 days.
对许多投资者来说,股票挑选的主要目的是要比整体市场获得更高的回报。但股票挑选的风险在于你可能会买入表现不佳的公司。不幸的是,这对于长期持有纽约证券交易所:PINS的Pinterest股东来说就是这种情况,因为股价在过去三年下跌了43%,远远低于大约18%的市场回报。股东们最近的情况甚至更加艰难,股价在最近90天下跌了25%。
With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.
鉴于此,值得看看该公司的基本面是否一直是长期业绩的驱动因素,或者是否存在一些不一致之处。
There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.
不可否认的是,市场有时是高效的,但价格并不总是反映潜在的商业表现。一个不完美但简单的方法来考虑公司市场感知如何改变是比较每股收益(EPS)变化和股价变动。
Pinterest became profitable within the last five years. We would usually expect to see the share price rise as a result. So it's worth looking at other metrics to try to understand the share price move.
在过去五年内,pinterest已经实现盈利。我们通常会期望看到股价的上涨。因此值得关注其他指标来尝试理解股价的波动。
Revenue is actually up 11% over the three years, so the share price drop doesn't seem to hinge on revenue, either. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Pinterest more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.
营业收入实际上在过去三年里增长了11%,因此股价下跌似乎并不依赖于营收。这份分析只是敷衍了事,但值得更仔细地研究pinterest,因为有时股票的下跌是不公平的。这可能会带来机会。
The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).
下图显示了收益和营收随时间变化的情况(如果你点击图像,可以看到更多细节):
It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts
值得注意的是,CEO的薪水低于规模相似公司的中位数。关注CEO的薪酬总是值得的,但更重要的问题是公司是否会在多年内增长收益。因此,我们建议查看这份显示共识预测的免费报告。
A Different Perspective
不同的观点
Pinterest shareholders are up 15% for the year. But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it is certainly better than the yearly loss of about 1.3% endured over half a decade. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Pinterest you should be aware of.
Pinterest的股东今年涨幅为15%。但这低于市场平均水平。好的一面是,这仍然是一种收益,并且绝对优于过去半个世纪遭受的每年1.3%的亏损。很可能业务正在稳定。虽然考虑市场条件对股价的不同影响是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。举个例子:我们注意到Pinterest有2个警示信号,您应该注意。
For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
对于那些喜欢寻找获胜投资的人来说,最近有内部购买的低估公司免费列表可能是一个很好的选择。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文所引述的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。