Does Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ:PLXS) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
大卫·伊本说得很好,'波动性并不是我们关心的风险。我们关心的是避免永久性的资本损失。'当我们考虑一家公司有多大风险时,我们总是喜欢看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过载可能导致灭亡。我们注意到Plexus Corp.(纳斯达克股票代码:PLXS)确实在其资产负债表上有债务。但真正的问题是这些债务是否让公司变得有风险。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
债务带来了什么风险?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
当企业无法通过自由现金流或以有吸引力的价格筹集资金来轻松履行债务义务时,债务和其他负债会变得有风险。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法定义务,股东可能一无所有。然而,更常见(但仍然昂贵)的情况是,一家公司必须以低廉的股价稀释股东权益,仅仅为了控制债务。然而,通过代替股份稀释,债务对于需要资金以高回报率投资增长的企业来说,可以是一个非常好的工具。当我们考虑一家公司的债务使用情况时,我们首先看现金和债务的总体情况。
How Much Debt Does Plexus Carry?
Plexus承载多少债务?
As you can see below, Plexus had US$303.8m of debt at June 2024, down from US$447.5m a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$269.9m in cash leading to net debt of about US$33.9m.
正如下图所示,Plexus在2024年6月的债务为303.8百万美元,较去年同期的447.5百万美元下降。相反,它有269.9百万美元的现金,从而导致净债务约为33.9百万美元。
A Look At Plexus' Liabilities
普雷克萨斯的负债情况一览
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Plexus had liabilities of US$1.72b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$179.8m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$269.9m as well as receivables valued at US$759.8m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$874.9m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
从最新的资产负债表数据来看,我们可以看到普雷克萨斯有17.2亿美元的短期债务,在12个月内到期;而超过该期限的负债有17,980万美元。抵消这些债务的是2,6990万美元现金,以及在12个月内到期的75,980万美元应收账款。所以,普雷克萨斯的负债总额比现金和近期应收账款合计多出87,490万美元。
Plexus has a market capitalization of US$3.46b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt. Carrying virtually no net debt, Plexus has a very light debt load indeed.
普雷克萨斯的市值为3.46亿美元,如果有需要,它很可能筹集资金来改善资产负债表。然而,我们仍然有必要仔细研究它偿还债务的能力。普雷克萨斯几乎没有净债务,债务负担非常轻。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。
While Plexus's low debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.13 suggests only modest use of debt, the fact that EBIT only covered the interest expense by 6.7 times last year does give us pause. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. On the other hand, Plexus's EBIT dived 18%, over the last year. If that rate of decline in earnings continues, the company could find itself in a tight spot. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Plexus's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
尽管普雷克萨斯的债务/EBITDA比率为0.13,只表明了对债务的适度使用,但去年EBIT与利息支出的比率仅为6.7倍,这确实令我们担忧。但利息支付肯定足够让我们思考其债务的支付能力。另一方面,普雷克萨斯的EBIT在过去一年下降了18%。如果收益下降速度继续下去,公司可能会陷入困境。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但与任何东西相比,未来的盈利将决定普雷克萨斯保持健康资产负债表的能力。所以,如果您关注未来,可以查看这个免费的报告,显示分析师的盈利预测。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Plexus reported free cash flow worth 12% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.
但我们最后需要考虑的也很重要,因为公司无法用纸面利润支付债务,它需要实际现金。因此,我们必须明确看看EBIT是否带来相应的自由现金流。在过去的三年中,普雷克萨斯报告的自由现金流只相当于EBIT的12%,这实际上非常低。对我们来说,这种低的现金转化率会引发对其偿还债务能力的一些担忧。
Our View
我们的观点
Plexus's EBIT growth rate and conversion of EBIT to free cash flow definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, with ease. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Plexus is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Plexus you should know about.
普雷克萨斯的EBIT增长率和EBIT转化为自由现金流肯定对其产生了重大影响,我们认为。但好消息是,根据其EBITDA,它似乎能够轻松应对其债务。当我们综合考虑所有讨论的因素时,我们认为普雷克萨斯在债务使用方面存在一些风险。虽然债务可以提高回报,但我们认为公司目前的杠杆已经足够。资产负债表显然是分析债务时应重点关注的区域。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中-远非如此。这些风险很难发现。每个公司都有这些风险,而我们已经发现了1个普雷克萨斯的警示信号,您应该了解。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
归根结底,专注于没有净债务的公司往往更好。您可以访问我们的特别列表,其中包括所有表现出盈利增长轨迹的公司。这是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。