The Travelers Companies, Inc.'s (NYSE:TRV) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.4% Over Last Week
The Travelers Companies, Inc.'s (NYSE:TRV) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.4% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Travelers Companies implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在Travelers Companies的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價具有重大影響力。
- 前14名股東持有該公司業務的50%。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每個The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV)的投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔有86%。換句話說,這個群體在他們投資該公司時可能獲得最多(或失去最多)的利益。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.7b in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 42%.
上週,該公司市值增加了17億美元,機構投資者的前景正在好轉。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前達到42%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Travelers Companies.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對Travelers Companies的影響。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Travelers Companies?
機構持股數量告訴我們關於Travelers Companies的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Travelers Companies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Travelers Companies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Travelers保險公司已經有機構在持股名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。 這表明受到專業投資者的一些認可。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。 當多個機構持有一隻股票時,存在它們是在一次「擁擠交易」中的風險。 當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。 在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以在下面看到Travelers保險公司的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事的背後總是有更多內容。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Travelers Companies. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能必須關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對沖基金在Travelers Companies中並沒有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.擁有9.4%的流通股。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約8.9%的流通股,第三大股東擁有6.8%的股權。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊上可以看到,前14大股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Travelers Companies
Travelers Companies的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Travelers Companies, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$203m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人員自己擁有《旅行者保險公司》少於1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人員擁有很小的比例。但是值得注意的是,他們擁有價值2,0300萬元的股票。可以點擊這裏查看內部人員最近的買賣情況。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Travelers Companies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆持有13%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對《旅行者保險公司》具有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但肯定對公司的運行產生了真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Travelers Companies better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮到持有公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Travelers保險公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。