Does North Copper (SZSE:000737) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does North Copper (SZSE:000737) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that North Copper Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000737) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
霍華德·馬克斯在他說到'與其擔心股價波動,我擔心的是永久性損失的可能性...而我認識的每位實際投資者都擔心這一點'時說得很好。 當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看看它的債務使用,因爲負債過高可能導致災難。我們注意到北方銅業股份有限公司(SZSE:000737)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但股東們是否應該擔心它的債務使用?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或者以有吸引力的價格發行股本來滿足這些責任時,債務和其他負債對企業變得冒險。在最壞的情況下,如果企業無法償付其債權人,就可能會破產。然而,更普遍(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低價募集新的股權資本,從而永久性稀釋股東的權益。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮公司使用債務的情況,首先看現金和債務的結合。
What Is North Copper's Net Debt?
北方銅業的淨負債是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 North Copper had debt of CN¥8.24b, up from CN¥3.86b in one year. However, it does have CN¥1.05b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about CN¥7.19b.
下面的圖片,您可以點擊查看更詳細信息,顯示2024年6月,北方銅業的債務爲82.4億人民幣,比一年前的38.6億人民幣有所增加。 不過,它確實有10.5億人民幣的現金來抵消這一點,導致淨債務約爲71.9億人民幣。
How Healthy Is North Copper's Balance Sheet?
北方銅業的資產負債表有多健康?
According to the last reported balance sheet, North Copper had liabilities of CN¥3.89b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥7.08b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥1.05b and CN¥278.3m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by CN¥9.64b.
根據最新業績,北方銅業短期內面臨38.9億人民幣的負債,長期面臨70.8億人民幣的負債。另一方面,該公司目前的現金爲10.5億人民幣,應收賬款爲27830萬人民幣。因此,其負債超過現金和(短期)應收賬款總和96.4億人民幣。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of CN¥15.2b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on North Copper's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其市值152億人民幣,這個赤字還是相當大的,因此股東們應該密切關注北方銅業的負債使用情況。這意味着如果公司需要迅速增加資產負債表的資金,股東們的持股比例將會被大幅稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。
North Copper's net debt is 4.3 times its EBITDA, which is a significant but still reasonable amount of leverage. However, its interest coverage of 23.9 is very high, suggesting that the interest expense on the debt is currently quite low. Notably, North Copper's EBIT launched higher than Elon Musk, gaining a whopping 126% on last year. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is North Copper's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
北方銅業的淨債務爲其贏利前利息、稅項、折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的4.3倍,這是一個相當可觀但仍然合理的槓桿倍數。然而,其利息承擔率爲23.9,非常高,說明債務的利息支出目前相當低。值得注意的是,北方銅業的EBIT增長超過了伊隆·馬斯克,去年大幅增長了126%。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的起點。然而,北方銅業的盈利將影響財務狀況如何保持穩定。因此,如果您想更多了解其盈利情況,可以查看其長期盈利趨勢圖。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, North Copper burned a lot of cash. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.
但我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用紙上利潤來償還債務,而是需要真金白銀。因此,我們明確需要看看這個EBIT是否帶來了相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,北方銅業燒掉了大量現金。儘管投資者無疑希望這種局面會在適當的時候扭轉,但這顯然意味着其債務使用更具風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
We feel some trepidation about North Copper's difficulty conversion of EBIT to free cash flow, but we've got positives to focus on, too. To wit both its interest cover and EBIT growth rate were encouraging signs. We think that North Copper's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for North Copper (2 are potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我們對北方銅業的EBIt難以轉換爲自由現金流感到一些憂慮,但我們也有積極的重點。 也就是說,它的利息保障和EBIt增長率都是令人鼓舞的跡象。 我們認爲,考慮到上述數據點,北方銅業的債務確實使其存在一定風險。 不是所有風險都是壞事,因爲如果風險得到回報,它可以提高股價回報,但這種債務風險值得牢記。 資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的重點領域。 但並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。 例如,我們發現了北方銅業的3個警示信號(其中2個可能嚴重!)在您在此投資之前,您應該注意這些。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。