With 81% Ownership, General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE:GD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 81% Ownership, General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE:GD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies General Dynamics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構持有的比例非常高,這意味着通用動力公司的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of General Dynamics Corporation (NYSE:GD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看通用動力公司 (紐交所:GD) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。機構持有81%的股份,是該公司的最大股東。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of General Dynamics.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了通用動力公司的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About General Dynamics?
機構所有權告訴我們有關通用動力公司的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in General Dynamics. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see General Dynamics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在通用動力公司中擁有相當一部分股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好對依賴於機構投資者的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在着它們涉及到的"擁擠交易"的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到通用動力公司的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in General Dynamics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is LongView Asset Management, LLC with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.1% and 5.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者持有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於通用動力而言,對沖基金並不持有太多股份。通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是LongView Asset Management, LLC,持有10%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有發行股份的8.1%和5.7%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of General Dynamics
通用動力的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of General Dynamics Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$509m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據表明,股票內部人士在通用動力公司自有名義下擁有不到1%的股份。 由於規模如此龐大,我們不會期望內部人士擁有大比例的股票。他們共擁有價值50900萬美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股份是件好事,但值得檢查的是這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over General Dynamics. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
持有13%的股份的是廣大的公衆,大多是個體投資者,他們對通用動力公司具有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能決策,但確實對公司的運行產生了實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand General Dynamics better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮公司的不同股東群體。但要更好地了解通用動力,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。