Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's (SHSE:600052) Earnings Are Weaker Than They Seem
Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's (SHSE:600052) Earnings Are Weaker Than They Seem
Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600052) robust earnings report didn't manage to move the market for its stock. Our analysis suggests that this might be because shareholders have noticed some concerning underlying factors.
浙江東望時代科技有限公司(SHSE:600052)的強勁盈利報告未能推動其股票的市場走勢。我們的分析表明,這可能是因爲股東們注意到了一些令人擔憂的潛在因素。
The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit
除了稀釋之外,還應該注意的是,萬集科技在過去12個月中因不尋常項目獲得了價值人民幣3.5萬元的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當這些不尋常項目對利潤做出重大貢獻時,我們會更加謹慎。我們對全球大部分上市公司的數據進行了分析,發現不尋常項目往往是一次性的。這正如我們所期望的那樣,因爲這些提升被描述爲"不尋常"。相對於其利潤而言,萬集科技在2021年12月前的不尋常項目貢獻大。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目正在使其財務利潤顯著增強。
To properly understand Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's profit results, we need to consider the CN¥60m gain attributed to unusual items. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And that's as you'd expect, given these boosts are described as 'unusual'. We can see that Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to June 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.
爲了正確理解浙江東望時代科技的利潤結果,我們需要考慮到其非凡項目所帶來的6000萬人民幣收益。我們不能否認,更高的利潤通常使我們感到樂觀,但如果利潤能夠持續下去我們更希望如此。當我們對成千上萬家上市公司的數據進行分析時,我們發現在某一年中由於非凡項目的提升通常不會在下一年重複出現。這是可以預料的,因爲這些增長被描述爲「非凡的」。我們可以看到,浙江東望時代科技的正面非凡項目相對於其2024年6月的利潤來說是相當重要的。因此,我們可以推斷出非凡項目使其法定利潤比它本來可能要強大得多。
Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology.
注意:我們始終建議投資者檢查資產負債表的強大程度。點擊這裏進入我們對浙江東望時代科技的資產負債表分析。
Our Take On Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's Profit Performance
對於浙江東望時代科技的利潤表現,我們的看法
As previously mentioned, Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's large boost from unusual items won't be there indefinitely, so its statutory earnings are probably a poor guide to its underlying profitability. For this reason, we think that Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's statutory profits may be a bad guide to its underlying earnings power, and might give investors an overly positive impression of the company. On the bright side, the company showed enough improvement to book a profit this year, after losing money last year. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology at this point in time. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology (including 1 which is significant).
正如之前提到的,東望時代因飛凡項目而出現的大幅增長不可能永遠存在,因此其法定收入可能不是準確反映其潛在盈利能力的良好指導。 因此,我們認爲,東望時代的法定利潤可能不是其潛在收益能力的良好指導,可能會給投資者對公司產生過於樂觀的印象。 光明面是,該公司今年實現了足夠的改善,可以盈利,去年才剛剛脫離虧損。 本文的目標是評估我們對法定收益能力的依賴程度,但還有很多要考慮的地方。 因此,儘管收益質量很重要,考慮到東望時代目前所面臨的風險同樣重要。 爲此,您應該了解我們發現的東望時代存在的3個警示信號(包括1個重要信號)。
This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Zhejiang Dongwang Times Technology's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
這份備忘錄只是着眼於一個揭示東望時代利潤性質的單一因素。 但是,如果你能將注意力集中在細枝末節上,總會發現更多。 例如,很多人認爲高股本回報率是良好商業經濟的指標,而另一些人則喜歡「跟着錢走」,尋找內部人員正在買入的股票。 因此,您可能希望查看這個免費收藏的公司,這些公司擁有高股本回報率,或者這份擁有高內部所有權股票的清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。