share_log

Does PTC (NASDAQ:PTC) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does PTC (NASDAQ:PTC) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

PTC(納斯達克:PTC)是否擁有健康的資產負債表?
Simply Wall St ·  09/03 08:22

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, PTC Inc. (NASDAQ:PTC) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。重要的是,PTC公司(納斯達克股票代碼:PTC)確實有債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會成爲風險。資本主義的組成部分是 「創造性破壞」 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。但是,更常見(但仍然令人痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低廉的價格籌集新的股本,從而永久稀釋股東。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理債務,而且對自己有利。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does PTC Carry?

PTC 揹負了多少債務?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, PTC had US$1.81b of debt, up from US$1.74b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had US$247.7m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.56b.

如下所示,截至2024年6月底,PTC的債務爲18.1億美元,高於去年同期的17.4億美元。點擊圖片查看更多細節。但是,它也有2.477億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲15.6億美元。

big
NasdaqGS:PTC Debt to Equity History September 3rd 2024
NASDAQGS: PTC 債券與股本的比率歷史記錄 2024 年 9 月 3 日

How Strong Is PTC's Balance Sheet?

PTC的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that PTC had liabilities of US$1.57b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.54b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$247.7m in cash and US$675.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$2.19b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,PTC的負債爲15.7億美元,一年後到期的負債爲15.4億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有2.477億美元的現金和6.75億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出21.9億美元。

Of course, PTC has a titanic market capitalization of US$21.5b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

當然,PTC的市值高達215億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以控制的。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東今後繼續監督資產負債表。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。

PTC has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.6 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 4.1 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Fortunately, PTC grew its EBIT by 2.8% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if PTC can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

PTC的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率爲2.6,其息稅前利潤支付了利息支出的4.1倍。總而言之,這意味着,儘管我們不希望債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以承受目前的槓桿率。幸運的是,PTC在去年將其息稅前利潤增長了2.8%,其債務相對於收益的比例逐漸減少。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定PTC能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, PTC actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.

但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,PTC產生的自由現金流實際上超過了eBIT。這種強勁的現金產生像穿着大黃蜂套裝的小狗一樣溫暖着我們的心。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, PTC's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its interest cover. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that PTC can handle its debt fairly comfortably. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that PTC is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

令人高興的是,PTC令人印象深刻地將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流,這意味着它在債務方面佔了上風。但是,更悲觀的是,我們對它的利息保障有點擔憂。綜合上述所有因素,令我們震驚的是,PTC能夠相當輕鬆地處理債務。從好的方面來看,這種槓桿作用可以提高股東的回報,但潛在的缺點是損失風險更大,因此值得關注資產負債表。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。請注意,PTC在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,您應該知道...

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論