share_log

Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Independent Bank Corp.的纳斯达克:INDB的机构投资者上周损失了3.7%,但受益于长期收益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 06:00

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高机构所有权意味着独立银行的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着独立银行公司(纳斯达克股票代码:INDB),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有83%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.6b last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上周该公司的市值跌至26亿美元后,机构投资者是受影响最大的群体。但是,17%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于独立银行的什么。

big
NasdaqGS:INDB Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
NASDAQGS:INDB 所有权明细 2024 年 9 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

关于独立银行,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Independent Bank. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Independent Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所见,机构投资者在独立银行拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下独立银行过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:INDB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
NASDAQGS:INDB 收益和收入增长 2024 年 9 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Independent Bank. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对独立银行进行有意义的投资。贝莱德公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的14%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的12%和5.6%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们做了进一步的挖掘,发现10位大股东约占登记册的50%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

独立银行的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Independent Bank Corp.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$24m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的最新数据显示,内部人士拥有的独立银行不到1%的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员有可能在不拥有大量比例权益的情况下拥有该公司的有意义的权益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约2400万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。你可以点击这里查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司16%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Independent Bank better, we need to consider many other factors.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解独立银行,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

归根结底,未来是最重要的。您可以访问这份关于公司分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发