Slowing Rates Of Return At Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) Leave Little Room For Excitement
Slowing Rates Of Return At Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) Leave Little Room For Excitement
To find a multi-bagger stock, what are the underlying trends we should look for in a business? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Groupon (NASDAQ:GRPN) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.
要找到一个翻番股,我们应该在业务中寻找哪些潜在的趋势?除了其他方面,我们希望看到两件事;首先,资本利用率(ROCE)增长,其次,公司资本利用量扩大。如果您看到这一点,通常意味着这是一个具有良好商业模式和丰富的盈利再投资机会的公司。然而,简要查看了数据后,我们认为Groupon(纳斯达克:GRPN)未来并非是一个翻番股,但让我们看看可能的原因。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本雇用回报率(ROCE)是什么?
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. The formula for this calculation on Groupon is:
只是为了澄清,如果您不确定,ROCE是评估公司在其业务中投入的资本所赚取的税前利润的度量标准。在Groupon的计算公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。
0.083 = US$23m ÷ (US$573m - US$290m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.083 = 2300万美元 ÷ (57300万美元 - 2.9亿美元)(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。
Thus, Groupon has an ROCE of 8.3%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Multiline Retail industry average of 12%.
因此,Groupon的ROCE为8.3%。从绝对值来看,这是一个较低的回报,它也表现不佳,低于多线零售行业的平均水平12%。
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Groupon compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Groupon for free.
以上是Groupon当前的ROCE与其过去的资本回报率的比较,但过去能够告诉我们的信息有限。如果你愿意,你可以免费查看分析师对Groupon的预测。
What Can We Tell From Groupon's ROCE Trend?
我们可以从Groupon的ROCE趋势中得出什么结论呢?
We're a bit concerned with the trends, because the business is applying 59% less capital than it was five years ago and returns on that capital have stayed flat. When a company effectively decreases its assets base, it's not usually a sign to be optimistic on that company. In addition to that, since the ROCE doesn't scream "quality" at 8.3%, it's hard to get excited about these developments.
我们对这些趋势有些担忧,因为这家企业现在的资本投入比五年前减少了59%,而资本回报率仍然保持不变。当企业有效地减少其资产基础时,通常不是一个乐观的迹象。此外,由于ROCE只有8.3%,很难对这些发展感到兴奋。
On a separate but related note, it's important to know that Groupon has a current liabilities to total assets ratio of 51%, which we'd consider pretty high. This effectively means that suppliers (or short-term creditors) are funding a large portion of the business, so just be aware that this can introduce some elements of risk. While it's not necessarily a bad thing, it can be beneficial if this ratio is lower.
在一个单独但相关的事项上,了解Groupon目前的流动负债占总资产的比例为51%,这被认为是相当高的。这意味着供应商(或短期债权人)正在为企业的大部分资金提供资助,所以请注意这可能引入一些风险。虽然这并不一定是坏事,但如果这个比例较低,可能会有好处。
Our Take On Groupon's ROCE
我们对Groupon的ROCE的看法
It's a shame to see that Groupon is effectively shrinking in terms of its capital base. And investors may be expecting the fundamentals to get a lot worse because the stock has crashed 80% over the last five years. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.
看到Groupon的资本基础在缩小,真是可惜。而且投资者可能预计基本面会变得更糟糕,因为该股在过去五年中下跌了80%。总的来说,这些固有的趋势并不是典型的多倍股,所以如果你追求这样的股票,我们认为你在其他地方可能会更有运气。
On a separate note, we've found 2 warning signs for Groupon you'll probably want to know about.
另外,我们发现了 Groupon 的2个警告信号,您可能会想知道。
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
如果您想寻找财务状况良好、回报卓越的实力强企业,可以免费查看以下公司列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。