share_log

LendingClub Corporation's (NYSE:LC) Institutional Investors Lost 6.7% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

LendingClub Corporation's (NYSE:LC) Institutional Investors Lost 6.7% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

lendingclub公司(纽交所:LC)的机构投资者过去一周损失了6.7%,但从长期收益中获利
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 06:44

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in LendingClub implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 16 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构在LendingClub中的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 前16名股东拥有公司50%的股份
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着LendingClub Corporation(纽约证券交易所代码:LC),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有76%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.7% last week. However, the 65% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

投资亏损是任何股东都不喜欢的事情,更不用说上周持股价值下降6.7%的机构投资者了。但是,65%的股东一年回报率可能有助于减轻他们的痛苦。但是,他们应该注意未来的进一步损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of LendingClub, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究LendingClub的每种类型的所有者。

big
NYSE:LC Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LC 所有权明细 2024 年 9 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LendingClub?

关于LendingClub,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that LendingClub does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see LendingClub's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,LendingClub确实有机构投资者;他们持有该公司很大一部分股票。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到LendingClub的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

big
NYSE:LC Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
纽约证券交易所:LC 收益和收入增长 2024 年 9 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. LendingClub is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 5.3% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Scott Sanborn directly holds 1.2% of the total shares outstanding.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。LendingClub 不归对冲基金所有。该公司的最大股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其所有权为11%。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.6%和5.3%的股份。此外,该公司首席执行官斯科特·桑伯恩直接持有已发行股份总额的1.2%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

从股东登记册来看,我们可以看到50%的所有权由前16名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东拥有所有权的多数股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of LendingClub

LendingClub 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We can see that insiders own shares in LendingClub Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$42m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人士拥有LendingClub Corporation的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的调整通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约4200万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探讨内幕调整问题,可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in LendingClub. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有LendingClub20%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - LendingClub has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。以风险为例,LendingClub 有 3 个警告信号(其中一个不容忽视),我们认为你应该知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析师对未来增长的预测,千万不要错过这份关于分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发