share_log

China Pacific Insurance (Group) (SHSE:601601) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 1.6% If They Invested Five Years Ago

China Pacific Insurance (Group) (SHSE:601601) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 1.6% If They Invested Five Years Ago

中国太保(集团)(SHSE:601601)的投资者如果五年前投资则损失1.6%。
Simply Wall St ·  09/11 01:40

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. So we wouldn't blame long term China Pacific Insurance (Group) Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601601) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 20% over a half decade. Contrary to the longer term story, the last month has been good for stockholders, with a share price gain of 9.3%.

对于许多人来说,投资的要点是产生比整个市场更高的回报。但是,即使是最好的选股者也只有在某些选择下才能获胜。因此,我们不会责怪中国太平洋保险(集团)股份有限公司(SHSE: 601601)的长期股东对他们的持股决定表示怀疑,该股在五年内下跌了20%。与长期情况相反,上个月对股东有利,股价上涨了9.3%。

It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.

值得评估的是,该公司的经济状况是否与这些令人难以置信的股东回报步调一致,或者两者之间是否存在一些差距。所以我们就这么做吧。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

沃伦·巴菲特在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多兹维尔的超级投资者》中描述了股价如何并不总是能合理地反映企业的价值。评估公司情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

While the share price declined over five years, China Pacific Insurance (Group) actually managed to increase EPS by an average of 4.3% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.

尽管股价在五年内下跌,但中国太平洋保险(集团)实际上设法将每股收益平均每年增长4.3%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。或者,市场此前可能非常乐观,因此尽管每股收益有所改善,但该股还是令人失望。

Given EPS is up and the share price is down, it's clear the market is more concerned about the business than it was previously. Generally speaking, though, if the company can keep growing EPS then the share price will eventually follow.

鉴于每股收益上升,股价下跌,很明显,市场比以前更关心该业务。但是,总的来说,如果公司能够继续增长每股收益,那么股价最终将随之而来。

You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

你可以在下面看到 EPS 是如何随着时间的推移而变化的(点击图片发现确切的值)。

big
SHSE:601601 Earnings Per Share Growth September 11th 2024
SHSE: 601601 每股收益增长 2024 年 9 月 11 日

Dive deeper into China Pacific Insurance (Group)'s key metrics by checking this interactive graph of China Pacific Insurance (Group)'s earnings, revenue and cash flow.

查看这张中国太平洋保险(集团)收益、收入和现金流的互动图表,深入了解中国太平洋保险(集团)的关键指标。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for China Pacific Insurance (Group) the TSR over the last 5 years was -1.6%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑股东总回报(TSR)和股价回报之间的差异。基于股息再投资的假设,股东总回报率纳入了任何分拆或贴现资本筹集的价值以及任何股息。可以公平地说,股东总回报率为支付股息的股票提供了更完整的画面。我们注意到,中国太平洋保险(集团)过去5年的股东总回报率为-1.6%,好于上述股价回报率。而且,猜测股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧是没有好处的!

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

It's good to see that China Pacific Insurance (Group) has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 5.7% in the last twelve months. Of course, that includes the dividend. Notably the five-year annualised TSR loss of 0.3% per year compares very unfavourably with the recent share price performance. We generally put more weight on the long term performance over the short term, but the recent improvement could hint at a (positive) inflection point within the business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for China Pacific Insurance (Group) you should know about.

很高兴看到中国太平洋保险(集团)在过去十二个月中向股东提供了5.7%的总股东回报率。当然,这包括股息。值得注意的是,五年期股东总回报率每年亏损0.3%,与最近的股价表现相比非常不利。我们通常更看重短期内的长期表现,但最近的改善可能暗示业务出现了(积极的)转折点。尽管市场状况可能对股价产生的不同影响值得考虑,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了一个你应该知道的中国太平洋保险(集团)警告信号。

Of course China Pacific Insurance (Group) may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

当然,中国太平洋保险(集团)可能不是最好的买入股票。因此,您可能希望看到这批免费的成长股。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发