share_log

KeyCorp's (NYSE:KEY) Institutional Investors Lost 5.1% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

KeyCorp's (NYSE:KEY) Institutional Investors Lost 5.1% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

keycorp的紐交所(NYSE:KEY)的機構投資者在過去一週中損失了5.1%,但從較長期的收益中獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  09/11 06:15

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, KeyCorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構持有該股的大量股份,KeyCorp的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前12名股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看KeyCorp(NYSE: KEY)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。在該公司持有最多股份的群體,準確地說,大約83%的股份是機構。換句話說,該群體在他們對公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或失去最多)的利益。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 5.1% in value last week. However, the 43% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧錢,特別是機構投資者上週看到自己的持股價值下降了5.1%。然而,股東的一年回報率達到了43%,可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。我們會假設他們會密切關注未來的弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of KeyCorp.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注KeyCorp的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:KEY Ownership Breakdown September 11th 2024
紐交所KEY所有權分析2024年9月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About KeyCorp?

機構持股告訴我們關於KeyCorp的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that KeyCorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at KeyCorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到KeyCorp確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的KeyCorp盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:KEY Earnings and Revenue Growth September 11th 2024
紐交所:2024年9月11日,KEY利潤和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in KeyCorp. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 5.8% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有該公司50%以上的股權,因此他們可能會對董事會決策產生很大影響。對於KeyCorp來說,對沖基金持有的股數並不多。公司的最大股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc。,持股比例爲12%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有該股票的11%和5.8%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權的深入研究表明,前12名股東合計擁有50%的持股,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of KeyCorp

KeyCorp的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of KeyCorp. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$65m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士持有KeyCorp不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人士擁有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值6500萬美元的股份。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但也許值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in KeyCorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有KeyCorp的16%股份。儘管這種所有權比例可能不足以影響他們在政策決策上的利益,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand KeyCorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - KeyCorp has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解keycorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,承擔風險 - keycorp有 2個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論