share_log

Earnings Growth of 0.8% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for CITIC (HKG:267) Shareholders

Earnings Growth of 0.8% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for CITIC (HKG:267) Shareholders

在过去的5年中,0.8%的收益增长对中信(HKG:267)的股东来说并没有转化为正回报
Simply Wall St ·  09/11 18:45

For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But in any portfolio, there will be mixed results between individual stocks. So we wouldn't blame long term CITIC Limited (HKG:267) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 29% over a half decade.

对于许多人来说,投资的要点是产生比整个市场更高的回报。但是在任何投资组合中,个股之间的结果都会好坏参半。因此,我们不会责怪中信有限公司(HKG: 267)的长期股东怀疑他们的持股决定,该股在五年内下跌了29%。

After losing 3.9% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.

在上周下跌3.9%之后,值得研究该公司的基本面,看看我们可以从过去的表现中推断出什么。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

尽管一些人继续教导高效市场假说,但事实证明,市场是反应过度的动态系统,投资者并不总是理性的。研究市场情绪如何随着时间的推移而变化的一种方法是研究公司股价与其每股收益(EPS)之间的相互作用。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, CITIC actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 4.3% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

在股价下滑的不幸五年中,中信的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年增长4.3%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。或者,过去的增长预期可能不合理。

By glancing at these numbers, we'd posit that the the market had expectations of much higher growth, five years ago. Looking to other metrics might better explain the share price change.

通过浏览这些数字,我们可以假设五年前,市场对更高的增长抱有预期。看看其他指标可能会更好地解释股价的变化。

We note that the dividend has remained healthy, so that wouldn't really explain the share price drop. It's not immediately clear to us why the stock price is down but further research might provide some answers.

我们注意到股息一直保持健康,因此这并不能真正解释股价下跌的原因。我们目前尚不清楚为什么股价下跌,但进一步的研究可能会提供一些答案。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以在下面看到收入和收入如何随着时间的推移而变化(点击图片了解确切的值)。

big
SEHK:267 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 11th 2024
SEHK: 267 2024年9月11日收益及收入增长

It's probably worth noting we've seen significant insider buying in the last quarter, which we consider a positive. On the other hand, we think the revenue and earnings trends are much more meaningful measures of the business. If you are thinking of buying or selling CITIC stock, you should check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

可能值得注意的是,我们在上个季度看到了大量的内幕买盘,我们认为这是积极的。另一方面,我们认为收入和收益趋势是衡量业务的更有意义的指标。如果您正在考虑买入或卖出中信股票,则应查看这份显示分析师利润预测的免费报告。

What About Dividends?

分红呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, CITIC's TSR for the last 5 years was -2.9%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是要考虑股东总回报(TSR)和股价回报之间的差异。尽管股价回报率仅反映股价的变化,但股东总回报率包括股息的价值(假设已进行再投资)以及任何折扣融资或分拆的收益。可以公平地说,股东总回报率为支付股息的股票提供了更完整的画面。碰巧的是,中信过去5年的股东总回报率为-2.9%,超过了前面提到的股价回报率。因此,公司支付的股息提高了股东的总回报率。

A Different Perspective

不同的视角

It's nice to see that CITIC shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 4.4% over the last year. That's including the dividend. There's no doubt those recent returns are much better than the TSR loss of 0.6% per year over five years. We generally put more weight on the long term performance over the short term, but the recent improvement could hint at a (positive) inflection point within the business. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for CITIC that you should be aware of.

很高兴看到中信股东去年获得了 4.4% 的股东总回报率。这包括股息。毫无疑问,最近的回报远好于五年内股东总回报率每年0.6%的亏损。我们通常更看重短期内的长期表现,但最近的改善可能暗示业务出现了(积极的)转折点。我发现将长期股价视为业务绩效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们已经为中信确定了一个你应该注意的警告标志。

CITIC is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying.

中信并不是内部人士唯一买入的股票。因此,看看这份内部人士一直在购买的估值诱人的小盘股公司的免费清单。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在香港交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发