share_log

Is EnerSys (NYSE:ENS) A Risky Investment?

Is EnerSys (NYSE:ENS) A Risky Investment?

艾諾斯(紐交所:ENS)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  09/14 08:30

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies EnerSys (NYSE:ENS) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

由伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李露對此毫不掩飾,他說:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。與許多其他公司一樣,EnerSys(紐約證券交易所代碼:ENS)也使用債務。但是這筆債務是股東關心的問題嗎?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但是如果企業無法還清貸款人的債務,那麼債務就任其擺佈。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理債務,而且對自己有利。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is EnerSys's Debt?

什麼是EnerSys的債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that EnerSys had US$897.1m of debt in June 2024, down from US$938.7m, one year before. However, it also had US$344.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$553.0m.

你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示EnerSys在2024年6月的債務爲8.971億美元,低於一年前的9.387億美元。但是,它也有3.441億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲5.530億美元。

big
NYSE:ENS Debt to Equity History September 14th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ENS 債務與股本比率的歷史記錄 2024 年 9 月 14 日

How Strong Is EnerSys' Balance Sheet?

Enersys的資產負債表有多強?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that EnerSys had liabilities of US$685.8m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.06b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$344.1m and US$507.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$894.1m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到,EnerSys在12個月內到期的負債爲6.858億美元,之後到期的負債爲10.6億美元。另一方面,它有3.441億美元的現金和價值5.079億美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出8.941億美元。

EnerSys has a market capitalization of US$3.94b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

EnerSys的市值爲39.4億美元,因此,如果需要,它很可能會籌集資金以改善其資產負債表。但是,仍然值得仔細研究其償還債務的能力。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。

EnerSys has net debt of just 1.1 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 9.0 times the interest expense over the last year. Also positive, EnerSys grew its EBIT by 22% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if EnerSys can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

EnerSys的淨負債僅爲息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的1.1倍,這表明它當然不是一個魯莽的借款人。這一觀點得到了穩健的利息覆蓋範圍的支持,去年息稅前利潤是利息支出的9.0倍。同樣樂觀的是,去年,EnerSys的息稅前利潤增長了22%,這將使未來更容易償還債務。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定EnerSys能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, EnerSys recorded free cash flow of 47% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是研究該息稅前利潤與實際自由現金流相匹配的比例。縱觀最近三年,EnerSys的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的47%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, EnerSys's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its interest cover also supports that impression! Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that EnerSys can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for EnerSys that you should be aware of.

令人高興的是,EnerSys令人印象深刻的息稅前利潤增長率意味着其債務佔上風。好消息不止於此,因爲它的興趣封面也支持了這種印象!綜合上述所有因素,令我們震驚的是,EnerSys能夠相當輕鬆地處理債務。當然,儘管這種槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但它確實帶來了更多的風險,因此值得關注。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。例如,我們已經確定了 EnerSys 的 1 個警告信號,您應該注意這一點。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,通常最好將注意力集中在沒有淨負債的公司身上。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長記錄)。它是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論