Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:MGIC) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$51m Last Week
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:MGIC) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$51m Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Magic Software Enterprises indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 2 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Magic Software Enterprises is 19%
- 公共公司对Magic Software Enterprises的持股比例较大,表明它们共同在管理和业务策略上具有更大的发言权
- 前两大股东拥有该公司的54%。
- Magic Software Enterprises的机构持股比例为19%
If you want to know who really controls Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (NASDAQ:MGIC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that public companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.(纳斯达克:MGIC),那么您就需要看看其股东名册的构成。我们可以看到公共公司拥有该公司47%的所有权。换句话说,该集团面临的最大上行潜力(或下行风险)最大。
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit US$565m market cap following a 9.8% gain in the stock.
因此,上周公共公司股价上涨9.8%,市值达到5.65亿美元,成绩最佳。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Magic Software Enterprises.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于magic software enterprises的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Magic Software Enterprises?
机构持股情况告诉我们有关magic software enterprises的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Magic Software Enterprises. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Magic Software Enterprises, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在magic software enterprises中持有相当大的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售一支股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查magic software enterprises过去的收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Magic Software Enterprises is not owned by hedge funds. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 47% of shares outstanding. With 7.0% and 1.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Clal Financial Management Ltd and Migdal Mutual Funds Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
Magic Software Enterprises不是由对冲基金持有的。 配方系统(1985)有限公司是目前持有47%股份的最大股东。 克拉尔金融管理有限公司和米格达尔互助基金有限公司分别持有7.0%和1.5%的持股量,是第二和第三大股东。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管有必要研究公司的机构持股数据,但研究分析师的情绪也是有道理的,以了解风向。这只股票有一些分析师的覆盖,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵盖面的空间。
Insider Ownership Of Magic Software Enterprises
Magic Software Enterprises的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$565m, and the board has only US$2.2m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我们最近的数据显示,内部持有者仅拥有魔术软件企业有限公司不到1%的股份。其市值仅为56500万美元,并且董事会只持有220万美元的股份。许多人倾向于希望看到董事会拥有更多的股份。一个不错的下一步可能是查看这个关于内部买入和卖出的免费摘要。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众——包括散户投资者——持有公司34%的股份,因此不能轻松忽视。尽管持股规模很大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
We can see that public companies hold 47% of the Magic Software Enterprises shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我们可以看到,上市公司持有Magic Software Enterprises股票总数的47%。 我们不能肯定,但很可能这是一种战略性股份。 这些企业可能类似,或者合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Magic Software Enterprises has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我发现查看公司真正的所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。 例如,承担风险 - Magic Software Enterprises有1个警示标志,我们认为你应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。