share_log

The Recent 4.3% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Man Li Wong's Week, Man Wah Holdings Limited's (HKG:1999) Most Bullish Insider

The Recent 4.3% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Man Li Wong's Week, Man Wah Holdings Limited's (HKG:1999) Most Bullish Insider

最近4.3%的漲幅一定給王文李CEO的一週增色不少,Man Wah Holdings Limited(HKG:1999)最看好的內部人士
Simply Wall St ·  09/19 18:07

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Man Wah Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Man Li Wong with a 62% stake
  • Institutional ownership in Man Wah Holdings is 15%
  • Man Wah Holdings的重要內部股東持股表明對公司擴張存在固有興趣
  • 公司最大股東是王文麗,持有62%的股份
  • 文華控股的機構所有權爲15%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Man Wah Holdings Limited (HKG:1999), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 63% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制着文華控股有限公司(HKG:1999),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。持有最大股份比例的是個人內部股東,持有63%的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下滑),這個群體將獲得最大利益(或者損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$17b market cap following a 4.3% gain in the stock.

作爲結果,內部人員上週得分最高,因爲公司的股票漲幅達到4.3%,市值達到170億港元。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Man Wah Holdings.

在下面的圖表中,我們會詳細查看Man Wah Holdings不同的持股群體。

big
SEHK:1999 Ownership Breakdown September 19th 2024
SEHK:1999所有權拆分,2024年9月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Man Wah Holdings?

機構投資者對Man Wah Holdings持有的公平股份相當大。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了股票,並且他們欣賞。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售某隻股票,那麼很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Man Wah Holdings過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Man Wah Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Man Wah Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

就像您所看到的,機構投資者在萬和控股擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下萬和控股的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
SEHK:1999 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 19th 2024
SEHK:1999於2024年9月19日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Man Wah Holdings. With a 62% stake, CEO Man Li Wong is the largest shareholder. This implies that they possess majority interests and have significant control over the company. Investors usually consider it a good sign when the company leadership has such a significant stake, as this is widely perceived to increase the chance that the management will act in the best interests of the company. Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.7% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 1.5% of the company stock.

我們注意到,對Man Wah Holdings而言,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。持有62%股份的CEO黃敏麗是最大的股東。這意味着他們擁有多數利益並對公司具有重要控制權。投資者通常認爲,當公司高層擁有如此重要的股份時,這被普遍視爲增加管理層將爲公司利益而行事的機會。Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd.是持有1.7%普通股的第二大股東,而The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有公司1.5%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Man Wah Holdings

Man Wah Holdings的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Man Wah Holdings Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful HK$11b stake in this HK$17b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

看起來內部持有滿華控股的股權超過了一半。這賦予他們很大的權力。這意味着內部人士在這家170億港元的業務中擁有一份非常有意義的110億港元的股份。大多數人都會樂於看到董事會與他們一同投資。您可能希望了解他們是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然持有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Man Wah Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Man Wah Holdings you should be aware of.

考慮到公司股東的不同群體總是值得一試。但爲了更好地了解滿華控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子:我們已經發現了滿華控股1個警示信號,您應該注意一下。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論