share_log

Institutional Investors Are Texas Pacific Land Corporation's (NYSE:TPL) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$2.8b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Texas Pacific Land Corporation's (NYSE:TPL) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$2.8b Market Cap Gain

机构投资者是texas pacific land公司(纽交所:TPL)最大的赌徒,在上周市值增加28亿美元后获得了奖励
Simply Wall St ·  09/20 12:35

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Texas Pacific Land implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 19 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 机构在texas pacific land拥有大量股份,这意味着他们对公司的股价有着重大影响
  • 前19大股东持有该公司50%的股份。
  • 最近有内部人员购买。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Texas Pacific Land Corporation (NYSE:TPL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 66% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解谁真正控制着Texas Pacific Land Corporation(纽交所:TPL),重要的是了解公司的所有权结构。我们可以看到机构在公司中拥有66%的所有权。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果出现下跌,则损失最大)。

Last week's 15% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 50% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上周的涨幅达到15%,这意味着即使公司显示出强劲的长期趋势,机构投资者也处于积极的一端。投资回报率为一年50%,上周的收益更是受人欢迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Texas Pacific Land.

让我们更仔细地看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于texas pacific land的什么。

big
NYSE:TPL Ownership Breakdown September 20th 2024
纽交所:TPL所有权拆分,2024年9月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Texas Pacific Land?

机构所有权告诉我们关于得克萨斯太平洋国土的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Texas Pacific Land already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Texas Pacific Land's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

texas pacific land的股东名册上已有机构。事实上,他们在公司拥有相当大的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好警惕依赖于机构投资者带来的所谓认可。他们也有时会做错误的决定。当多家机构持有某股票时,总是存在它们是在一种“拥挤交易”中的风险。当这种交易出错时,多方可能竞相快速卖出股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以查看下面的texas pacific land的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事中总有更多内容。

big
NYSE:TPL Earnings and Revenue Growth September 20th 2024
纽交所:TPL营业收入和收入增长2024年9月20日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Texas Pacific Land. The company's largest shareholder is Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation, with ownership of 16%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.7% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 8.7% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们很可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。我们注意到对于texas pacific land,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。公司最大的股东是Horizon Kinetics Holding Corporation,持有16%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股东,持有公司9.7%的普通股,The Vanguard Group,Inc.持有公司股份的约8.7%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记簿,我们可以看到前19名股东控制了50%的股权,这意味着没有单一股东掌控着多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。研究分析师的看法也可以达到同样的效果。股票的分析师覆盖率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空间来增加其覆盖范围。

Insider Ownership Of Texas Pacific Land

得克萨斯太平洋国土的内部股权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Texas Pacific Land Corporation. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$27m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

根据我们最新的数据显示,内部持有者仅拥有德克萨斯太平洋土地公司不到1%的股份。作为一家大公司,我们只希望内部持有者拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值2700万美元的股份。董事会成员持有股份是件好事,但值得注意的是,可能需要检查这些内部持有者是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大众,包括零售投资者,持有该公司34%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这样的持有量不足以左右政策决策方向,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解公司过去的表现。您可以在以下详细图表中找到历史收益和收入。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发