share_log

Marriott International, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MAR) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.5% Over the Past Week

Marriott International, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MAR) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 5.5% Over the Past Week

萬豪酒店國際公司(納斯達克股票代碼:MAR)的大型機構持股人一定很高興,因爲股價繼續表現出色,過去一週上漲了5.5%。
Simply Wall St ·  09/22 08:22

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Marriott International's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持有股份的比例較高意味着萬豪酒店的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 業務的50%由前21名股東持有。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in Marriott International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MAR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 65% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

萬豪國際公司(NASDAQ:MAR)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。佔有65%股份的群體擁有最大的利潤潛力(或風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 5.5% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 27% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

結果,機構投資者在該公司股價上漲5.5%後獲得了最大的回報。目前的一年回報率爲27%,上週的漲幅將被熱烈歡迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Marriott International.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了萬豪酒店不同的所有權集團。

big
NasdaqGS:MAR Ownership Breakdown September 22nd 2024
納斯達克指數:MAR持股結構分佈於2024年9月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Marriott International?

機構投資者持股情況給我們關於萬豪酒店的信息。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Marriott International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Marriott International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到萬豪酒店確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司的相當一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票並且喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,值得看一下萬豪酒店的收入歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:MAR Earnings and Revenue Growth September 22nd 2024
納斯達克GS:萬豪酒店的收益和營業收入增長2024年9月22日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Marriott International is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 7.2% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.4% and 4.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應該注意,實際上超過半數的股份由機構擁有,因此它們可以集體行使重要的權力。萬豪酒店的股份不是被對沖基金所擁有。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,佔總股份的7.2%。而第二大和第三大股東分別持有總股份的5.4%和4.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Marriott International

萬豪國際的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Marriott International, Inc.. Insiders own US$5.8b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告說,萬豪國際酒店的內部人士持有股份。內部人士目前持有58億美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是令人高興的。您可以在這裏檢查內部人員最近是否有買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

本公司持股的22%股份由普通公衆--包括散戶投資者--擁有,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然該組無法對公司進行必要的調查工作,但它的確會對公司的經營產生實質性影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.8%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司的4.8%股份。值得進一步深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬人公司中有利益,應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能還對該公司有戰略性興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Marriott International .

我發現查看公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意萬豪國際存在 1個警示信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論