Public Companies Account for 53% of Genting Singapore Limited's (SGX:G13) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 37%
Public Companies Account for 53% of Genting Singapore Limited's (SGX:G13) Ownership, While Individual Investors Account for 37%
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Genting Singapore by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 53% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Genting Berhad)
- Institutions own 10% of Genting Singapore
- 公共公司對雲頂新加坡的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多權力來影響管理和治理相關決策
- 公司的53%股份由單一股東（雲頂有限公司）持有
- 機構擁有云頂新加坡10%的股份
If you want to know who really controls Genting Singapore Limited (SGX:G13), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is public companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想了解誰真正控制着雲頂新加坡有限公司（新加坡交易所：G13），那麼您需要查看其股東註冊情況。 持有公司股份最多的集團，準確地說約爲53%，是公共公司。 也就是說，如果股價上漲（或者如果出現下行），該集團將獲益最多（或者損失最大）。
Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 37% of the company's stockholders.
另一方面，個人投資者佔該公司股東的37%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Genting Singapore.
讓我們更仔細地看看吉寶新加坡的不同類型股東能告訴我們些什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genting Singapore?
機構持股告訴我們有關吉寶新加坡的什麼？
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此，他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Genting Singapore already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Genting Singapore's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
吉寶新加坡已經在股東名冊上有機構。實際上，他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實，因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資，就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法，你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此，值得查看一下吉寶新加坡的收益歷史。當然，未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Genting Singapore. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Genting Berhad with 53% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 1.9% and 1.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
對雲頂新加坡的對沖基金持有的股份並不多。 從我們的數據來看，持有最多股份的是雲頂集團，佔已發行股份的 53%。這意味着他們控制了公司未來的大部分利益。 擁有相應已發行股份的 1.9% 和 1.6%，第二和第三大股東分別是美國先鋒集團和黑石集團。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票，因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Genting Singapore
雲頂新加坡的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的，並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員，至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告，後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是，有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時，內部所有權是積極的。然而，高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下，這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Genting Singapore Limited. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$42m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最近的數據顯示，內部持有人擁有新加坡雲頂集團股份不到1%。請記住這是一家大公司，內部持有人擁有價值4200萬新元的股票。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事，但值得一提的是看一下這些內部持有人是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有公司37%的股份，因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌控決策，但它肯定會對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 53% of Genting Singapore. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們覺得上市公司擁有云頂新加坡53%的股份。這可能是戰略利益，兩家公司可能有相關業務利益。可能是它們進行了分拆。這一持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步：
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Genting Singapore better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Genting Singapore that you should be aware of.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解新加坡雲頂，我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如，我們已經確定了新加坡雲頂的一個警告信號，你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣，可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是，您可以查看此免費報告，顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注：本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋？對內容有任何疑慮？請直接與我們聯繫。或者，發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論，只使用公正的方法論，我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議，也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意，我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。