These 4 Measures Indicate That Valmont Industries (NYSE:VMI) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well
These 4 Measures Indicate That Valmont Industries (NYSE:VMI) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Valmont Industries, Inc. (NYSE:VMI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
当我们考虑一家公司的风险时,我们总是喜欢看它的债务使用情况,因为债务过多可能会导致破产。我们注意到维蒙特工业(NYSE:VMI)的资产负债表上确实有债务。但真正的问题是这笔债务是否使得公司变得风险更大。
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
为什么债务会带来风险?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般来说,当一家公司不能轻松地通过筹集资本或自己的现金流来偿还债务时,债务才真正成为现实问题。如果公司不能履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能一无所获。然而,更常见(但仍然痛苦)的情况是,其必须以低价筹集新的股权资本,从而永久性地稀释股东。通过取代稀释,债务可以成为需要资本以高回报率投资增长的企业的极好工具。考虑一家企业使用多少债务时,首先要做的是查看其现金和债务。
How Much Debt Does Valmont Industries Carry?
维蒙特工业承担了多少债务?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Valmont Industries had debt of US$1.02b, up from US$955.7m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$163.1m, its net debt is less, at about US$856.8m.
下面的图片显示,您可以点击以查看更详细信息,在2024年6月,维蒙特工业的债务为10.2亿美元,比一年前的9,557万美元增加。然而,由于其有一个1.631亿美元的现金储备,其净债务更少,约为8,568万美元。
How Healthy Is Valmont Industries' Balance Sheet?
维蒙特工业的资产负债表表现如何?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Valmont Industries had liabilities of US$705.0m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.23b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$163.1m as well as receivables valued at US$895.1m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$881.2m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我们可以从最近的资产负债表中看到,维蒙特工业有短期到期的负债为7.05亿美元,而超过一年到期的负债为12.3亿美元。 抵消这些义务,该公司持有1.631亿美元的现金以及12个月内到期的价值8.95亿美元的应收账款。 因此,其负债总额达到8.812亿美元,超过了其现金和短期应收账款的总和。
Of course, Valmont Industries has a market capitalization of US$5.69b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
当然,维蒙特工业的市值为56.9亿美元,因此这些负债可能是可以管理的。 话虽如此,明显我们应该继续监控其资产负债表,以防止出现恶化情况。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我们通过将公司的净债务与其息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)相除,并计算其息税前利润(EBIT)如何覆盖其利息费用(利息覆盖率)来衡量公司的债务负担相对于其盈利能力。因此,我们同时考虑债务的绝对数量以及所支付的利率。
Valmont Industries has net debt of just 1.4 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 9.5 times the interest expense over the last year. Fortunately, Valmont Industries grew its EBIT by 4.6% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Valmont Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
维蒙特工业的净债务仅为EBITDA的1.4倍,表明其绝对不是一个鲁莽的借款人。 而这一观点得到了坚实的利息支付能力的支持,过去一年的EBIT是利息费用的9.5倍。 幸运的是,维蒙特工业在过去一年中将其EBIT增长了4.6%,使得债务负担看起来更加可控。 在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。 但最终业务未来的盈利能力将决定维蒙特工业是否能够随时间加强其资产负债表。 因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看该免费报告,其中显示了分析师的利润预测。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Valmont Industries recorded free cash flow of 37% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最后,虽然税务部门可能喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受真金白银。 因此,合乎逻辑的下一步是查看EBIT中实际自由现金流量所占比例。 查看最近三年,维蒙特工业记录的自由现金流占其EBIT的37%,低于我们的预期。 这种弱势现金转换使其更难处理债务。
Our View
我们的观点
On our analysis Valmont Industries's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For example, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow makes us a little nervous about its debt. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that Valmont Industries is managing its debt quite well. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Valmont Industries has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
在我们的分析中,维蒙特工业的利率期货覆盖率应该表明它在债务方面不会有太多麻烦。但是我们上面提到的其他因素并不那么令人鼓舞。例如,它将EBIt转化为自由现金流的能力让我们对其债务感到有些紧张。当我们考虑以上提到的所有因素时,我们认为维蒙特工业在管理债务方面做得相当不错。话虽如此,负债确实相当沉重,我们建议股东密切关注。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解债务的大部分内容。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中 - 远非如此。例如,维蒙特工业有4个警告信号,我们认为您应该注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
归根结底,专注于没有净债务的公司往往更好。您可以访问我们的特别列表,其中包括所有表现出盈利增长轨迹的公司。这是免费的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。