Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300892) CEO Mu Wang Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 34% Last Week
Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300892) CEO Mu Wang Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 34% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant insider control over Pinlive Foods implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 2 shareholders own 62% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 對Pinlive Foods的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
- 前兩名股東擁有公司62%的股份
- 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的了解
A look at the shareholders of Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300892) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 67% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Pinlive食品有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300892)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人內部人士持有67%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥1.8b market cap following a 34% gain in the stock.
結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲34%後達到18元人民幣。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pinlive Foods.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Pinlive Foods的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pinlive Foods?
關於Pinlive Foods,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Pinlive Foods, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
由於機構僅擁有Pinlive Foods的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮這隻股票。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時買入股票,股價大幅上漲的情況並不少見。因此,請查看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但請記住,最重要的是未來。
Pinlive Foods is not owned by hedge funds. With a 45% stake, CEO Mu Wang is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
Pinlive Foods不歸對沖基金所有。首席執行官王牧持有45%的股份,是最大股東。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約16%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有5.3%的所有權。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Pinlive Foods
Pinlive Foods 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Pinlive Foods Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥1.8b, that means they have CN¥1.2b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Pinlive食品有限公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。鑑於其市值爲18元人民幣,這意味着他們擁有價值12元人民幣的股票。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司23%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.3%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司5.3%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Pinlive Foods that you should be aware of.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經確定了Pinlive Foods的兩個警告信號,你應該注意這些信號。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。