share_log

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:2777) Most Bullish Insider Is Top Key Executive Sze Lim Li, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 34% Last Week

Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:2777) Most Bullish Insider Is Top Key Executive Sze Lim Li, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 34% Last Week

廣州富力地產股份有限公司(HKG:2777)最看好的內部人士是最高主管李思霖,他們的股份價值上週增長了34%
Simply Wall St ·  09/24 20:32

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Guangzhou R&F Properties' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 56% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 廣州富力地產的大量內部持股表明公司擴張中存在潛在利益
  • 前兩大股東持有該公司的56%股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

Every investor in Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd. (HKG:2777) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 57% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

廣州富力地產有限公司(HKG:2777)的每位投資者都應該注意公司中最強大的股東集團。擁有公司中最多股份的集團,具體而言佔公司股份的約57%,是個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下跌),該集團將受益最多(或者損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$3.3b market cap following a 34% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,隨着公司股價上漲34%,市值達到33億港元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Guangzhou R&F Properties, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解廣州富力地產每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
SEHK:2777 Ownership Breakdown September 25th 2024
SEHK:2777持股結構拆分2024年9月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangzhou R&F Properties?

機構持股告訴我們有關廣州富力地產的什麼問題?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Guangzhou R&F Properties. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

機構對廣州富力地產的持股很少。這表明公司吸引了一些基金的關注,但目前並不特別受專業投資者青睞。如果業務從此變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多機構有意購買的情況。當多個機構投資者想要購買股票時,我們經常看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入軌跡(如下所示)可能是未來增長的一個指標,但並不能保證。

big
SEHK:2777 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 25th 2024
SEHK:2777 2024年9月25日收入和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Guangzhou R&F Properties. Our data suggests that Sze Lim Li, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 29%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 28% and 1.9% of the stock.

對於廣州富力地產,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。我們的數據表明,同時也是該公司最高主要執行人員的Sze Lim Li持有29%的股份。當內部人員持有公司股票的大量股份時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人員願意將自己的財富與公司的未來聯繫在一起。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約28%和1.9%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.

股東登記簿的更詳細研究顯示,前兩大股東佔有該公司56%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Guangzhou R&F Properties

廣州富力地產內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of HK$3.3b, that means they have HK$1.9b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,廣州富力地產股份有限公司的內部人士擁有超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制了該公司。鑑於其市值爲33億港元,這意味着他們擁有價值19億港元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,表明與股東的強烈契合。您可以 點擊這裏 查看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Guangzhou R&F Properties. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有39%的股權,主要由個人投資者組成的廣州富力地產的普通大衆在一定程度上對公司有影響力。儘管擁有的股權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Guangzhou R&F Properties that you should be aware of.

我覺得查看公司究竟由誰擁有很有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定廣州富力地產存在2個警示信號,你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論