Tansun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300872) Market Cap Rose CN¥464m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 50% Profited and so Did Insiders
Tansun Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300872) Market Cap Rose CN¥464m Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 50% Profited and so Did Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Tansun Technology's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 27% of Tansun Technology is held by insiders
- 天阳科技的重要零售投资者持股表明关键决策受到更多公众股东的影响
- 前25位股东拥有公司的50%股份。
- 天阳科技的27%股份由内部持有
A look at the shareholders of Tansun Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300872) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看天阳科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300872)的股东可以告诉我们哪一组最强大。持有最大股份的是拥有50%所有权的零售投资者。换句话说,该组最有可能从对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥4.6b last week, while insiders who own 27% also benefitted.
上周市值达到46亿元后,零售投资者获利最多,拥有27%的内部股东也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tansun Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解天阳科技的每种所有者类型,从下图开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tansun Technology?
机构投资者持有的天阳科技的股份告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Tansun Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tansun Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所见,机构投资者在天阳科技拥有相当比例的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅凭这一事实就作出判断,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多家机构持有一只股票时,存在被认为是"拥挤交易"的风险。一旦这样的交易出现问题,多方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下方看到天阳科技的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事总是更加复杂。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Tansun Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jianping Ouyang with 22% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.9% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我们注意到,对于天阳科技,对冲基金并没有大规模投资。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是CEO欧阳建平,持有22%的股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的9.9%和5.0%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Tansun Technology
天阳科技的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Tansun Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.2b stake in this CN¥4.6b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,内部人员在天阳科技股份有限公司拥有大量股份。内部人员在这家市值460亿人民币的企业中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以点击这里查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 50% stake in Tansun Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,在天阳科技持有相当大的50%股份,这意味着它是一只相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权规模赋予了来自普通公众的投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以并且可能会影响执行薪酬、股利政策和拟议的业务收购决策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私营企业持有该公司股份的10%。 单凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得查明是谁拥有那些私营企业。 有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过另一个私营公司持有公共公司股份的利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tansun Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Tansun Technology you should be aware of.
想了解一个公司拥有股份的不同团体总是值得的。但要更好地理解天阳科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。我们就以一个例子为证:我们已经发现了天阳科技的一个警示信号,你应该注意下这个。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。