Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Pak Tak International Limited (HKG:2668) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
When Is Debt A Problem?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
How Much Debt Does Pak Tak International Carry?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Pak Tak International had HK$355.3m of debt in June 2024, down from HK$375.4m, one year before. On the flip side, it has HK$58.8m in cash leading to net debt of about HK$296.5m.
A Look At Pak Tak International's Liabilities
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Pak Tak International had liabilities of HK$474.7m falling due within a year, and liabilities of HK$78.6m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of HK$58.8m as well as receivables valued at HK$511.4m due within 12 months. So it actually has HK$16.8m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
Having regard to Pak Tak International's size, it seems that its liquid assets are well balanced with its total liabilities. So while it's hard to imagine that the HK$2.48b company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is Pak Tak International's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
Over 12 months, Pak Tak International reported revenue of HK$725m, which is a gain of 66%, although it did not report any earnings before interest and tax. With any luck the company will be able to grow its way to profitability.
Caveat Emptor
While we can certainly appreciate Pak Tak International's revenue growth, its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is not ideal. Indeed, it lost HK$14m at the EBIT level. Looking on the brighter side, the business has adequate liquid assets, which give it time to grow and develop before its debt becomes a near-term issue. But a profit would do more to inspire us to research the business more closely. So it seems too risky for our taste. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Pak Tak International (of which 2 are significant!) you should know about.
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.