Is Now The Time To Put Manhattan Associates (NASDAQ:MANH) On Your Watchlist?
Is Now The Time To Put Manhattan Associates (NASDAQ:MANH) On Your Watchlist?
For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' A loss-making company is yet to prove itself with profit, and eventually the inflow of external capital may dry up.
對初學者而言,買入一家向投資者講述良好故事的公司(即使目前沒有收入和利潤記錄)可能似乎是個好主意(以及令人興奮的前景)。但正如彼得·林奇在《華爾街勝經》中所說,「冷門股票幾乎從來不會有好結果。」 沒有經常盈利的公司尚未通過盈利證明自己,最終外部資本的流入可能會枯竭。
In contrast to all that, many investors prefer to focus on companies like Manhattan Associates (NASDAQ:MANH), which has not only revenues, but also profits. Even if this company is fairly valued by the market, investors would agree that generating consistent profits will continue to provide Manhattan Associates with the means to add long-term value to shareholders.
相比之下,許多投資者更喜歡關注像Manhattan Associates(納斯達克股票代碼:MANH)這樣不僅有營業收入,還有利潤的公司。即使這家公司被市場合理定價,投資者也會認爲持續盈利將繼續爲Manhattan Associates提供增加股東長期價值的手段。
How Fast Is Manhattan Associates Growing?
曼哈頓協作發展有多快?
Generally, companies experiencing growth in earnings per share (EPS) should see similar trends in share price. Therefore, there are plenty of investors who like to buy shares in companies that are growing EPS. Impressively, Manhattan Associates has grown EPS by 29% per year, compound, in the last three years. So it's not surprising to see the company trades on a very high multiple of (past) earnings.
一般來說,盈利每股收益(EPS)增長的公司股價趨勢應該相似。因此,有很多投資者喜歡購買盈利每股收益增長的公司股票。令人印象深刻的是,Manhattan Associates過去三年年均盈利每股收益增長了29%,複利。因此,看到該公司的股價按照(過去)盈利計算的倍數很高也就不足爲奇了。
Top-line growth is a great indicator that growth is sustainable, and combined with a high earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margin, it's a great way for a company to maintain a competitive advantage in the market. The good news is that Manhattan Associates is growing revenues, and EBIT margins improved by 2.8 percentage points to 24%, over the last year. That's great to see, on both counts.
銷售額增長是持續增長的重要指標,結合高利潤稅前息前利潤(EBIT)率,這是公司在市場上保持競爭優勢的良好途徑。好消息是Manhattan Associates的營業收入持續增長,並且過去一年EBIT利潤率提高了2.8個百分點達到24%。在這兩個方面都看到這樣的增長是非常棒的。
The chart below shows how the company's bottom and top lines have progressed over time. For finer detail, click on the image.
下圖顯示了該公司底線和頂線隨着時間的推移而發展的情況。點擊圖片以獲取更精細的詳細信息。
Fortunately, we've got access to analyst forecasts of Manhattan Associates' future profits. You can do your own forecasts without looking, or you can take a peek at what the professionals are predicting.
幸運的是,我們可以獲取到對Manhattan Associates未來利潤的分析師預測。您可以獨立進行預測,也可以看看專業人士的預測。
Are Manhattan Associates Insiders Aligned With All Shareholders?
Manhattan Associates內部人員與所有股東是否保持一致?
Since Manhattan Associates has a market capitalisation of US$17b, we wouldn't expect insiders to hold a large percentage of shares. But we do take comfort from the fact that they are investors in the company. Indeed, they have a considerable amount of wealth invested in it, currently valued at US$137m. While that is a lot of skin in the game, we note this holding only totals to 0.8% of the business, which is a result of the company being so large. This still shows shareholders there is a degree of alignment between management and themselves.
由於Manhattan Associates的市值爲170億美元,我們不會指望內部人員持有大部分股份。但事實上,他們是公司的投資者,這讓我們感到安心。他們在公司投資了相當大的財富,目前價值爲13700萬美元。儘管這是一大筆投資,但我們注意到,這些持股僅佔到公司的0.8%,這是公司規模如此龐大的結果。這仍然表明股東與管理層之間存在一定程度的利益一致。
It means a lot to see insiders invested in the business, but shareholders may be wondering if remuneration policies are in their best interest. A brief analysis of the CEO compensation suggests they are. The median total compensation for CEOs of companies similar in size to Manhattan Associates, with market caps over US$8.0b, is around US$13m.
看到內部人員投資於業務意味着很多,但股東可能會想知道薪酬政策是否符合他們的最佳利益。對CEO薪酬的簡要分析表明是符合的。與Manhattan Associates類似規模、市值超過80億美元的公司的CEO的中位數總薪酬約爲1300萬美元。
Manhattan Associates offered total compensation worth US$9.2m to its CEO in the year to December 2023. That is actually below the median for CEO's of similarly sized companies. While the level of CEO compensation shouldn't be the biggest factor in how the company is viewed, modest remuneration is a positive, because it suggests that the board keeps shareholder interests in mind. Generally, arguments can be made that reasonable pay levels attest to good decision-making.
Manhattan Associates在2023年12月向其CEO提供價值920萬美元的總薪酬。實際上低於類似規模公司CEO的中位數。雖然CEO薪酬水平不應是評價公司的最重要因素,但適度的薪酬是積極的,因爲這表明董事會考慮到股東的利益。一般而言,可以提出合理的薪酬水平證明決策是明智的。
Is Manhattan Associates Worth Keeping An Eye On?
曼哈頓公司值得關注嗎?
If you believe that share price follows earnings per share you should definitely be delving further into Manhattan Associates' strong EPS growth. If that's not enough, consider also that the CEO pay is quite reasonable, and insiders are well-invested alongside other shareholders. Everyone has their own preferences when it comes to investing but it definitely makes Manhattan Associates look rather interesting indeed. You still need to take note of risks, for example - Manhattan Associates has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
如果你相信股價跟隨每股收益,那你應該進一步深入研究曼哈頓公司強勁的EPS增長。如果這還不足以說服你,考慮一下CEO的薪酬是相當合理的,內部人員也同其他股東一起進行了良好的投資。每個人在投資時都有自己的喜好,但曼哈頓公司確實看起來相當有趣。你仍然需要注意風險,例如 - 曼哈頓公司有1個警示信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings.
總是有可能買入未增長收益並且內部人員不買入股票的股票表現良好。但是對於那些認爲這些重要指數的人,我們鼓勵您查看具有這些功能的公司。您可以訪問定製列表,其中列出了已經展示出增長並得到內幕人員認可的公司。
Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction.
請注意,本文討論的內部交易是指在相關司法管轄區中報告的交易。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。