share_log

Read This Before Judging The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CHEF) ROE

Read This Before Judging The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CHEF) ROE

在评判The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.(纳斯达克:CHEF)的roe之前,请阅读此文。
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 06:25

Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHEF).

许多投资者仍在学习分析股票时可能有用的各种指标。本文适用于那些想了解股本回报率(ROE)的人。为了使课程以实用为基础,我们将使用投资回报率来更好地了解厨师仓库公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CHEF)。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.

股本回报率或投资回报率是对公司增值和管理投资者资金的有效性的考验。简而言之,投资回报率显示了每美元从其股东投资中产生的利润。

How Is ROE Calculated?

ROE 是如何计算的?

The formula for ROE is:

ROE 的公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营业务)÷ 股东权益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Chefs' Warehouse is:

因此,根据上述公式,厨师仓库的投资回报率为:

8.8% = US$41m ÷ US$462m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

8.8% = 4,100万美元 ÷ 4.62亿美元(基于截至2024年6月的过去十二个月)。

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.09 in profit.

“回报” 是过去十二个月的税后收入。对此进行概念化的一种方法是,该公司每拥有1美元的股东资本,就能获得0.09美元的利润。

Does Chefs' Warehouse Have A Good ROE?

厨师仓库的投资回报率好吗?

One simple way to determine if a company has a good return on equity is to compare it to the average for its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Chefs' Warehouse has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Consumer Retailing industry classification.

确定公司股本回报率是否不错的一种简单方法是将其与该行业的平均水平进行比较。这种方法的局限性在于,有些公司与其他公司有很大不同,即使在相同的行业分类中也是如此。如果你看下图,你会发现厨师仓库的投资回报率低于消费零售行业分类中的平均水平(12%)。

big
NasdaqGS:CHEF Return on Equity September 27th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:Chef 股本回报率 2024 年 9 月 27 日

Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books.

不幸的是,这并不理想。但是,低投资回报率并不总是坏事。如果公司的债务水平处于中等至低水平,那么仍然有可能通过使用财务杠杆来提高回报。投资回报率低的高负债公司完全是另一回事,对我们的账面来说也是一项风险投资。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

为什么在考虑投资回报率时应该考虑债务

Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

实际上,所有公司都需要资金来投资业务,以增加利润。投资现金可以来自上一年的利润(留存收益)、发行新股或借款。在第一和第二种情况下,投资回报率将反映出现金投资业务的使用情况。在后一种情况下,用于增长的债务将提高回报,但不会影响总权益。这将使投资回报率看起来比不使用债务时要好。

Combining Chefs' Warehouse's Debt And Its 8.8% Return On Equity

合并厨师仓库的债务及其8.8%的股本回报率

Chefs' Warehouse clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.47. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.

Chefs's Warehouse显然使用大量债务来提高回报,因为它的负债权益比率为1.47。即使使用了巨额债务,其投资回报率也相当低;在我们看来,这不是一个好结果。投资者应该仔细考虑如果一家公司无法如此轻易地借款,其表现会如何,因为信贷市场确实会随着时间的推移而发生变化。

Conclusion

结论

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

股本回报率是我们可以比较不同公司的业务质量的一种方式。能够在不负债过多的情况下获得高股本回报的公司通常质量很好。如果两家公司的投资回报率相同,那么我通常更喜欢负债较少的公司。

Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

话虽如此,尽管投资回报率是衡量业务质量的有用指标,但您必须考虑一系列因素才能确定购买股票的正确价格。重要的是要考虑其他因素,例如未来的利润增长以及未来需要多少投资。因此,我认为可能值得查看这份关于分析师对公司的预测的免费报告。

But note: Chefs' Warehouse may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt.

但请注意:厨师仓库可能不是最值得购买的股票。因此,来看看这份投资回报率高、债务低的有趣公司的免费清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发