share_log

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

拥有86%的机构所有权,Evergy, Inc. (纳斯达克:EVRG)在大型机构中备受青睐
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 09:07

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Evergy's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高机构所有权意味着Evergy的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 前 19 名股东拥有公司 51% 的股份
  • 业内人士最近卖出了

A look at the shareholders of Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Evergy, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:EVRG)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为86%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,投资于公司的机构资金中有很大一部分通常是对公司未来的巨大信任票。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Evergy.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Evergy的什么。

big
NasdaqGS:EVRG Ownership Breakdown September 27th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EVRG 所有权明细 2024 年 9 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Evergy?

关于Evergy,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Evergy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Evergy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Evergy确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Evergy的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:EVRG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 27th 2024
纳斯达克GS:EVRG收益和收入增长 2024年9月27日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Evergy. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are State Street Global Advisors, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.2%.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Evergy进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股东,已发行股份的13%。第二和第三大股东是道富环球顾问公司和贝莱德公司,其持股量相等,为7.2%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记处,我们可以看到,51%的所有权由前19名股东控制,这意味着没有一个股东在所有权中拥有多数股权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Evergy

Evergy 的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Evergy, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$45m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有Evergy, Inc.不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值4500万美元的股票。在这种情况下,看看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出可能会更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Evergy. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有Evergy13%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Evergy (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,你应该了解我们在Evergy身上发现的3个警告信号(其中一个有点令人担忧)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发