With 75% Institutional Ownership, Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ:NDSN) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 75% Institutional Ownership, Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ:NDSN) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Nordson's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 考慮到機構在股票中所持有的大部分股份,Nordson的股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響
- 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ:NDSN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Nordson Corporation(納斯達克:NDSN),重要的是要了解公司的所有權結構。擁有公司大部分股份的是一個擁有約75%股份的團體,換句話說,這個團體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下降風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Nordson.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於nordson的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nordson?
機構持股告訴我們有關 Nordson 的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Nordson does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nordson's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到 Nordson 確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會判斷錯誤。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價急劇下跌。因此,值得查看 Nordson 以下的歷史收益數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Nordson. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.8% of common stock, and Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management, LLC holds about 4.5% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股份的一半,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對於Nordson,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有公司已發行股份的11%。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有普通股的6.8%,而Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management, LLC持有公司股份約4.5%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的了解,我們發現前16名股東共同擁有公司50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司有足夠的控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Nordson
Nordson的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Nordson Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$663m. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有nordson公司的一些股份。 內部人士持有價值66300萬美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是好事。您可以在這裏檢查看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nordson. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大衆擁有16%的股權,主要由個人投資者構成,對nordson具有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決定的走向,但仍然能對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.7%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司股份的4.7%。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人士通過持有私人公司而不是以個人能力持有公開公司的股份來參與公開公司。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是作爲進一步研究的一個方面。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Nordson is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
在考慮擁有公司的不同群體時是相當有價值的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,nordson在我們的投資分析中顯示1個警告標誌,你應該知道...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。