Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Innovita Biological Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688253) Market Cap Rises to CN¥5.4b
Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Innovita Biological Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688253) Market Cap Rises to CN¥5.4b
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Innovita Biological Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Innovita Biological Technology is 28%
- 內部人似乎對Innovita Biological Technology的增長有着極大的投資興趣,這可以從他們所持股的數量來看
- 該公司總計有4位投資者持有大部分股份,佔有52%的所有權。
- Innovita Biological Technology的機構持股比例爲28%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Innovita Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688253), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 37% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰才真正控制着Innovita Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688253),理解公司的所有權結構是非常重要的。個別內部人以37%的股份持有公司最大的股份。換句話說,該組織將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或損失最大)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥5.4b market cap following a 7.6% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,由於股價上漲7.6%,公司市值達到了54億人民幣,上週內部人士得分最高。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Innovita Biological Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Innovita Biological Technology的每種所有者類型,首先從以下圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Innovita Biological Technology?
機構持股告訴我們有關Innovita Biological Technology的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Innovita Biological Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Innovita Biological Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Innovita Biological Technology已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯投資錯誤,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Innovita Biological Technology的以下盈利歷史。當然,真正重要的是未來。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Innovita Biological Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Fengguang Ye, with ownership of 28%. With 11% and 9.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Yingtan Yujiang Yingsi Xinda Enterprise Management Center (Limited Partnership) and Xiujie Zhang are the second and third largest shareholders. Xiujie Zhang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
對Innovita Biological Technology,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。該公司最大的股東是葉鳳光,持有28%的股權。分別持有11%和9.2%的流通股的是鷹潭玉江英斯信達企業管理中心(有限合夥)和張秀潔,它們是第二和第三大股東。張秀潔是第三大股東,同時也是董事會成員。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了一件事實,即約52%的公司由前四大股東控制,表明這些股東對公司具有重要的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Innovita Biological Technology
Innovita Biological Technology的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Innovita Biological Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.4b, and insiders have CN¥2.0b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
根據我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有英諾瓦生物科技股份有限公司相當比例的股權。其市值僅爲54億人民幣,內部人士名下的股份總值爲20億人民幣。看到內部人士如此投資於業務,這是很好的。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Innovita Biological Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,在英諾瓦生物科技持有20%的股份。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以左右政策決定向他們青睞,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Innovita Biological Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
看起來,私人公司擁有Innovita Biological Technology股份的13%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查擁有這些私人公司的人。有時內部人員或其他相關方會通過另一個私人公司持有某家上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Innovita Biological Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
儘管考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,Innovita Biological Technology在我們的投資分析中出現了1個警示信號,您應該了解...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。