Chahua Modern Housewares Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603615) Adds CN¥532m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 53% Stake in That Gain
Chahua Modern Housewares Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603615) Adds CN¥532m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 53% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Chahua Modern Housewares' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 5 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Institutions own 13% of Chahua Modern Housewares
- 茶花股份的重要內部持有股份表明公司擴張具有固有利益
- 前五大股東擁有公司54%的股份。
- 機構持有茶花現代家居13%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Chahua Modern Housewares Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603615) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 53% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看看茶花股份有限公司(SHSE:603615)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最具影響力。持有最大股份的是個人內部股東,持有53%的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最大(或者如果出現下行市場,損失最大)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.4b market cap following a 18% gain in the stock.
作爲結果,在公司股價上漲18%之後,內部人員上週得分最高,市值達到34億人民幣。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chahua Modern Housewares.
在以下圖表中,我們將重點關注茶花股份的不同持股集團。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chahua Modern Housewares?
機構投資者在茶花股份中有相當的持股量,這表明專業投資者對該公司具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。因此,值得關注的是茶花股份的過去的盈利軌跡(如下圖所示)。當然,還要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Chahua Modern Housewares. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chahua Modern Housewares, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在茶花現代家居中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看茶花現代家居的過去收益軌跡(下面)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Chahua Modern Housewares is not owned by hedge funds. Guan Yu Chen is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.9% and 8.0% of the stock.
茶花股份不是由對沖基金持有。陳管育目前是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東各持有約9.9%和8.0%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即約有54%的公司由前五大股東控制,表明這些業主在業務中擁有重要的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Chahua Modern Housewares
普通公衆投資者持有茶花股份的股份爲32%,儘管這一比例可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,這可能不足以改變公司的政策。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Chahua Modern Housewares Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥1.8b worth of shares in the CN¥3.4b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部持有超過一半茶花股份有限公司的股權。這賦予他們很大的權力。這意味着他們在價值34億人民幣的公司中擁有18億人民幣的股份。這相當有意義。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示與股東有着強烈的一致性。 您可以點此查看這些內部人士是否一直在購買或出售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆--包括散戶股東--擁有公司33%的股權,因此他們無法輕易被忽略。儘管這種所有權尺寸可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Chahua Modern Housewares better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Chahua Modern Housewares (at least 1 which is a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到擁有公司股份的各個群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解茶花股份,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮投資風險這個無處不在的幽靈。我們已經確定了茶花股份的2個警告信號(至少其中1個有點令人擔憂),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。