Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688325) Market Cap Touched CN¥2.8b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 36% as Well as Institutions
Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688325) Market Cap Touched CN¥2.8b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 36% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- 25% of Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics is held by Institutions
- 私人企業對廣東創微電子的重要控制權意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
- 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
- 廣東創微電子25%的股份由機構持有
If you want to know who really controls Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688325), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想了解誰真正控制着廣東創微電子股份有限公司(SHSE:688325),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到私人企業擁有公司36%的所有權,這意味着該集團在股票上漲時將獲益最多(或在發生下滑時損失最大)。
Following a 14% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but institutions who own 25% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
股價上週增長了14%,私人公司獲利最多,但持有25%股份的機構也有望從增長中獲益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於廣東創智微電子的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics?
機構投資者擁有廣東賽微電子相當多的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。 當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」中的風險。 當這樣的交易出了差錯時,多個方面可能會爭相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以在下面看到廣東賽微電子的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,這裏永遠有更多的故事。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
廣東創智微電子已經有機構在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這一事實來依賴,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人一樣。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總是存在它們參與的「擁擠交易」風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到廣東創智微電子的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics. The company's largest shareholder is Dongguan Weitu Investment Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership), with ownership of 21%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 5.8% of the stock.
我們注意到,對廣東賽微電子沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是東莞維圖投資管理合夥企業(有限合夥),持有21%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約12%和5.8%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構持股是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的一種好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。我們目前沒有注意到該股票的任何分析師報告,因此該公司不大可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics
廣東賽微電子的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.8b, and insiders have CN¥94m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有廣東卡位微電子股份有限公司的股份。它的市值僅爲28億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有9400萬元人民幣的股份。看到內部人士有一些投資是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
佔有22%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在廣東卡位微電子有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定偏向他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Guangdong Cellwise Microelectronics board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
擁有12%股權的股權投資公司可能會影響廣東Cellwise Microelectronics董事會。一些投資者可能會因爲這一點而感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。另外,這些持有者可能在將其公開後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 36%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我非常有興趣了解公司的股權結構。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如風險。每個公司都存在風險,我們已經發現了浙江昂利康製藥有限公司的1個警告信號,您應該知道。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。